4,6
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

4,6
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

Über LogicMonitor

LogicMonitor ist eine cloudbasierte Lösung zur Überwachung der Netzwerkleistung, die Unternehmen dabei unterstützt, On-Premise-, cloudbasierte und hybride Rechenzentren sowie physische Geräte von einer einzigen Plattform aus zu überwachen. LogicMonitor erkennt automatisch die mit dem Netzwerk verbundenen Geräte, erfasst deren Informationen und beginnt mit der Leistungsüberwachung.

LogicMonitor bietet Tools, mit denen große Datenblöcke zur Datenüberwachung und Problemlösung in kleinere Silos zerlegt werden können. Das Dashboard ermöglicht den Nutzern die Überwachung von Live-Leistungsindikatoren zusammen mit einer Liste von Systemproblemen und -zuständen.

LogicMonitor erfasst automatisch Leistungsdaten von angeschlossenen Servern, Netzwerken und Workstations. Interne IT-Teams können sich per Textnachricht, E-Mail oder Voicemail benachrichtigen lassen, wenn ein Problem gefunden wird. Nutzer können Probleme priorisieren, Eskalationsregeln für Warnungen konfigurieren und Ausfallzeiten gemäß ihren Servicestandards planen. LogicMonitor umfasst nutzerdefinierte Grafiken und Diagramme und kann so mehrere Geräte in derselben Grafik vergleichen und Systemzustandsindikatoren in Echtzeit anzeigen.

LogicMonitor Software - 1
LogicMonitor Software - 2
LogicMonitor Software - 3
LogicMonitor Software - 4
LogicMonitor Software - 1 - Vorschau
LogicMonitor Software - 2 - Vorschau
LogicMonitor Software - 3 - Vorschau
LogicMonitor Software - 4 - Vorschau

LogicMonitor Preis

LogicMonitor bietet keine Gratisversion, aber eine kostenlose Testversion. Die kostenpflichtige Version von LogicMonitor ist ab 375,00 $/Monat verfügbar.

Startpreis:
375,00 $/Monat
Kostenlose Version:
Nein
Kostenlose Testversion:
Ja

Alternativen für LogicMonitor

LogicMonitor Erfahrungen

Funktionsbewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4,3
Funktionalität
4,5
Bedienkomfort
4,3
Kundenbetreuung
4,6
5 von 109 Bewertungen Alle Bewertungen anzeigen
Robert
Robert
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionen
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 3.2.2016

LogicMonitor is a great choice!

When we approached our monitoring project, we evaluated a number of different solutions. We'd been using Solarwinds for several years and we simply felt that it wasn't the right product for us. That isn't to say that Solarwinds isn't a good product! We used it significantly over the years but we needed something that fit us as an overwhelmed and understaffed IT Team better. We are a small company of about 250 employees and 5 offices across the US and many remote employees around the world. When we came upon LogicMonitor, it was clear that this was a different product and company. They were incredibly helpful during our evaluation and even allowed us to extend our trial period for longer than I am comfortable specifying (more embarrassing to me that our eval took so long). There are many factors that led us to choose LogicMonitor, but some of the biggest are: - Ease of Use: "Out of the box", they recognize and monitor so much of what we use, including the smaller vendors. If they don't recognize something, it is a fairly simple process to request that they add it to their software. Needless to say, this saves us a ton of time! In addition to recognizing the devices, they automatically add a set of monitors that they feel are the most important, but also give you the ability to easily disable what you aren't interested in or add additional monitors if they don't support something you wish to monitor. - SaaS: We knew we wanted something that could provide both internal and external monitoring, AND be available for our technicians, wherever they were. The lone drawback to their model is the number of internal servers required to monitor everything we wish to. For our main office, we needed to deploy a second server to complement the first because we were monitoring so much stuff. A very small price to pay for the ease of use and administration for the platform. - Price: Unlike many other vendors, LogicMonitor doesn't charge you per monitor, they only charge for the device. For example, in other products, a 48-port switch could use up 100+ monitoring licenses to monitor all ports and all of the critical switch functions. Logicmonitor only charges you 1 license to monitor the switch and you can have (I believe) an unlimited number of monitored items within that switch. For a smaller company like ours, cost is definitely a large factor and LogicMonitor was definitely a leader in this category. There are a lot of other factors that I could go into, but I'd rather not write a novel. Suffice to say that if you are in the market for a new monitoring solution, I HIGHLY recommend that you look into LogicMonitor. I'm confident that you will come away impressed and they will immediately become one of your top choices to implement!

Vorteile

Many of them mentioned above.

Nachteile

Not many, but the response time for requesting new device/vendor recognition could improve.

vinay kumar reddy
  • Branche: Versicherung
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionen
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 18.5.2023

One of the best Monitoring Tool

All are good the overall features are good

Vorteile

Overall features are good especially the grouping and alert ruling features are good

Nachteile

Sometimes it get slow in the portal. It should have an application rathet than web app

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Datadog

Gründe für den Wechsel zu LogicMonitor

I havent tested the other tools so cant judge
Madalyn
  • Branche: Bankwesen
  • Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionen
3
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
0

3
Bewertet am 11.5.2023

LogicMonitor Review

Vorteile

LogicMonitor is easy to use, but it can be slightly overwhelming when first implemented due to the large amount of data it pulls. After several months of use I think the most beneficial information has been the resource metric utilization. It helped us discover that some of our core systems were under provisioned, being able to pull the metric information to show more resources were needed helped resolve critical performance issues.

Nachteile

I think the ability for LogicMonitor to auto correct some of the simple issues that can affect systems is missing. For example, LogicMonitor can report if a Windows service is stopped but it would be a nice feature if LogicMonitor could attempt to automatically restart it. Another nice feature would be if LogicMonitor could monitor software versions and alert if the version changes. An example would be a Windows server that require a certain version of Java.

Kevin
  • Branche: Öl & Energie
  • Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3
Funktionen
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
5

4
Bewertet am 18.5.2023

It’s pretty good

Pretty good.

Vorteile

Easy to use and drill into issues, easy to add resources.

Nachteile

Making dashboards is challenging, configuring alerting rules is cumbersome.

Sean
Sean
  • Branche: Automotive
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionen
0
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 15.2.2016

When Cloud Monitoring Makes Sense

At this time I am on v.71 with Collectors at version 20. I began using LogicMonitor around 2 years ago. It was one of the best "outsourcing" decisions we have made. Now have nearly 550 nodes in our environment and a countless number of stock and custom datasources we are alerting on utilizing a range of collection types including SNMP, WMI, Groovy, and Powershell.

We previously used OpManager and had considered SolarWinds (I used it in a previous enterprise and was very happy with it). In the end, there were a couple factors that lead us to LM and kept us there. First, we are a very lean shop, and the manpower cost of standing up a new monitoring platform along with maintaining yet another machine, while minimal, was going to take time and that was a consideration. Second, we had a lot of stuff we wanted to monitor on each server and a bunch of product owners we wanted to have the ability to monitor thier products, the way they measured that didn't work against us. Finally, we wanted a way to monitor both internally and externally since we ourselves are a SAAS provider. LM satisfied all three.

When we first came on board, they were reasonably new, and the turnaround time on custom datasources was minimal. I guess they are a victim of their own success, my one and only criticism is that now the turnaround on datasources is measured in months not hours. Otherwise, they are hitting on all cylinders. Their java collector is lightweight and can handle a good deal of throughput, I myself have between 100-150 nodes on my larger collectors with 1-minute collection on most datapoints. They have been in a positive development cycle over the past 18 months as they rolled out a new UI for not only for their App but their support site as well. I like how they did some hand holding for us "old timers" who had grown used to the utilitarian and direct legacy UI. They let us run that if we chose to, but introduced new dashboard and service elements in the new UI only, giving us more carrot than stick to make the leap. They are continuously improving their interface, especially their dashboards, giving us the ability to embed third party graphs (in our case some New Relic APM elements) into their layout. I am hoping they will allow us to soon provide a way to embed our LM dashboards into other iframes or share out directly. As a whole, the product is barely recognizable as it was when we came on board, yet every bit as functional with certain elements such as bulk alert tuning and multi-instance management providing even more.

They have released a native iPhone application, it is good for alerting, however they have a good way to go to make it more usable overall. If they do to it what they have done to the web portal, it will be amazing. As it stands, our entire department has the application loaded and peek at it throughout our off hours, acknowledging alerts that we may not have seen yet because of the way our escalation rules have been written. It gives us some advance notice to spot a trend from other departments before it lands on our laps. The escalation rules and who they go to are fully tweakable as well as how users get alerted (email, sms, phone call). We have even begun alerting automation scripts to fire off on certain alert types. They have listened to their customers and continue to act on our needs. When renewals come up, there is no debate that we will keep them. They have become an embedded resource and so long as they keep performing at this level they will remain there.

Vorteile

Their drive to improve the product! It's hands down the nicest evolution of a product over a short span I have seen. Their product is continually getting enhanced, new datasources are being added to the library, new features into their mobile app and new content in their training sessions. I spoke to many of their pro's in the review, but their continuous improvement cycle is truly impressive.

I also want to give a special shout-out to the help-desk for helping me out of many datasource woes.

Nachteile

It may not be a major part of their value proposition to new customers, but datasource creation was part of the pitch for us old timers. In the beginning I loved how quickly their folks could crank out an oddball datasource for me. Now don't get me wrong, their help-desk definitely hits the mark for fixing some of my minor mistakes in datasource creation, but when I need something deep I got to wait months. In case LM is looking at this, I'm specifically awaiting a google analytic integration which I saw advertised on your site but didn't exist (to your credit, thanks for taking it down after we found that out.)

Ähnliche Kategorien