--- description: Reviews zu Onshape Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche Onshape mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Onshape | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Angebotssoftware für Maurer- und Betonarbeiten](/directory/53/concrete-masonry-software/software) > [Onshape](/software/73467/onshape) # Onshape Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/73467/onshape Seite: 1 / 16\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/73467/onshape?page=2) > Onshape ist ein CAD-System, das die Produktivität von Designern steigert. Bei diesem System können mehrere Designer über Cloud-Dienste mit jedem Telefon, Tablet oder Computer gleichzeitig auf dasselbe Design zugreifen und daran arbeiten. Die Lösung verhindert Datenverluste, Designblockaden und Abstürze, sodass Designer optimale Arbeit abliefern können. Onshape hat den Dateiprüfungsprozess und die kontextbezogene Bearbeitung vereinfacht. Du erhältst die vollständige Kontrolle über die Daten, da du deine Daten in einem sicheren Cloud-Arbeitsbereich speichern kannst. Die gemeinsame Nutzung von Daten ist mit Onshape einfach und schnell, was die Kosten für zusätzlichen lokalen Speicher spart. Mit der Funktion zur Kontrolle und Überwachung des Zugriffs können die Nutzer sehen, wer Änderungen am Design oder Inhalt vorgenommen hat. Mit der neuesten Version von Onshape gehören Konfigurations-, Betriebs- oder Kompatibilitätsprobleme der Vergangenheit an. > > Bewertung: **4.5/5** von 357 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.5/5** | 357 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: PTC - **Region**: Needham, USA - **Gegründet**: 1985 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 1.410,00 € - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Chromebook (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch, Italienisch, Japanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Argentinien, Australien, Belarus, Belgien, Bosnien und Herzegowina, Brasilien, Chile, China, Deutschland, Dänemark, Finnland, Frankreich, Griechenland, Irland, Israel, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Kolumbien, Libanon und 20 weitere ## Funktionen - 2D-Zeichnung - 3D-Design und Modellierung - 3D-Imaging - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Animation - Anmerkungen - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung und Statistik - CAD-Werkzeuge - Datei-Verwaltung - Daten-Import / -Export - Datenvisualisierung - Design-Analyse - Design-Management - Dokumentenmanagement - Dokumentenspeicher - Echtzeit-Vergleiche - Elektrisch ## Integrationen (11 insgesamt) - Cadasio - Capital X Panel Designer - Duro - ESPRIT - KeyShot - Mastercam - OnScale Solve - OpenBOM - SimScale - SimSolid - SprutCAM ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Chat ## Category - [Angebotssoftware für Maurer- und Betonarbeiten](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/53/concrete-masonry-software/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Angebotssoftware für Maurer- und Betonarbeiten](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/53/concrete-masonry-software/software) - [Apps für Bauleiter](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/1722/best-apps/software) - [Solar Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/3865/solar/software) - [PPS-Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4704/manufacturing/software) - [Bausoftware](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4133/construction/software) ## Alternativen 1. [AutoCAD](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/390127/autocad) — 4.7/5 (3213 reviews) 2. [CATIA](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/115806/catia) — 4.6/5 (224 reviews) 3. [AutoCAD LT](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/422335/autocad-lt) — 4.6/5 (226 reviews) 4. [Autodesk Fusion](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/420072/fusion-360) — 4.5/5 (270 reviews) 5. [ActCAD](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/198067/actcad-2021-professional) — 4.2/5 (214 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "OnShape will impress." — 5.0/5 > **Jason** | *20. Juli 2026* | Landwirtschaft | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Ease of use, performance without the high dollar PC, massive assembly mate reduction, and never losing data. > > **Nachteile**: 3 Party add-ons vs built in features. Would really like to be able to add reference geometry in assemblies. > > I had heard of OnShape a few years ago and downloaded the app to my phone to briefly check it out. Being 20+ year SolidWorks user, I did pay much attention to it. After getting a chance to interview for a position at a company that was using it, I quickly went through the on-line tutorials in case I had to hit the ground running. I ended up get the position and was able to create over 1850 assemblies, parts, and drawings within a year. I've since created sheet metal parts, machined parts, injection/rotational molds, and 3D printer proto-types. I've created building and site layouts as well. ----- ### "Revolutionary CAD" — 5.0/5 > **Victor** | *20. Juli 2026* | Hausmeisterservice | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's cloud native, the pdm is native, I don't have to rebuild parts and assemblies all the time. I also can use git like versioning schemes, which is an industry first. > > **Nachteile**: I guess what it's also it's main strength: being completely run on the cloud, which requires an active internet connection. > > Overall we're very happy with, being able to finally implement a pdm tool and increase the collaboration between team members. ----- ### "Works well, wish they hadn't done a bate-n-switch on small users" — 5.0/5 > **Zachary** | *18. Oktober 2019* | Lebensmittelproduktion | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Really, REALLY slick web interface and mobile app. Designing parts and mechanisms from any computer, just wow\! Quickly sharing, very good version tracking - it's the real deal. > > **Nachteile**: They started out positioned very nicely for small-time users, 10 private documents, but switched to "public only" free documents at the same time as they aggressively pushed for subscriptions. > > It's still super impressive to me to pull up a model on mobile and show friends/customers how it looks, parts that move. The platform is great, just wish it was a little more generous like at the start. ----- ### "Great for collaboration and easy document management" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *21. Juli 2026* | Erneuerbare Energien & Umwelt | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Document management is convenient in that if you move files around, it does not break assemblies. Revision history is very helpful and being able to revert to an older version or branch from a version is so useful. I love being able to collaborate with others in my organization within a document. I think I also prefer Onshape's mate connector system over the mating features in other CAD software I have used. Onshape support has been efficient and helpful in my experience whenever I have had any issues or questions. > > **Nachteile**: No feature to be able to bulk export files to have a non-cloud-based backup of files. Performance can be sluggish on occasion. I have not tried using the AI integration much, but when I have, it has not been particularly helpful. > > Since switching to Onshape over a year ago, it has quickly become my go to CAD platform thanks to its clean UI, easy document management, and great training resources and support. I have been very impressed with Onshape's performance, particularly as it is a cloud-based software. I also love that there is a free standard version that I can use for personal projects outside of work. ----- ### "Senior Industrial Designer / Owner" — 5.0/5 > **Ben** | *6. August 2026* | Design | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I value Onshape for its file management, allowing me to create and iterate quickly through versions without the hassle of saving work or losing track of progress. It also helps with live progress updates. The versions, versioning, and branching features stand out to me the most, as they support my rapid design iteration. Not having to save files and dealing with software that doesn't crash are significant advantages. The flexibility and collaboration capabilities are also key reasons why I switched to Onshape. The initial setup was very easy for the most part, even though there was a bit of a learning curve. Overall, it has been a good experience. > > **Nachteile**: Mating and context editing can be frustrating because parts move around unexpectedly, and I have to constantly update the context in the assembly. The mental model around context editing could benefit from tips and tricks pop-ups or other UI cues to help prevent unwanted parts and therefore reference movements. Versioning and branching can be confusing; the mental model, UI/UX, and training around versioning could be improved. Importing multibody parts or assemblies requires extra steps to prevent them from freely moving. I wish there was a way to easily make all parts rigid when importing. I have tried the "composite body" option, but it doesn't work well. Edge selection is also challenging sometimes as it prioritizes face selection rather than edge selection, making me zoom in and orient parts several times to select the edge. I'm not sure if this is a graphics issue with my display or an Onshape problem. Selecting other sketches while working in a new sketch is cumbersome; I have to exit the command (line circle etc.) to then go back and force the coincident reference a master sketch point, which feels like an extra unnecessary step. Rebuild times could improve. > > Overall this software is a no brainer, it allows for iterative product development across teams, allowing easy and effective collaboration. Onshape continues to update and improve week to week so any issue experienced can be fixed by the Onshape team on the fly. The Onshape team listens and responds well. I chose Onshape because its a software that continues to improve and reacts to users needs. ----- Seite: 1 / 16\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/73467/onshape?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/73467/onshape) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten