--- description: Reviews zu MyGet Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche MyGet mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: MyGet | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [DevOps Tools](/directory/4380/devops/software) > [MyGet](/software/446021/myget) # MyGet Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/446021/myget Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/446021/myget?page=2) > MyGet ist eine cloudbasierte Paketverwaltungslösung, mit der DevOps-Teams die Verwaltung und Prüfung der IT-Infrastruktur eines Unternehmens über ein einheitliches Portal optimieren können. Administratoren können rollenbasierte Berechtigungen bereitstellen, mit denen Nutzer Pakete konfigurieren und Feeds und Pakete mit internen Stakeholdern teilen können. Mit MyGet können Vorgesetzte die Paketnutzung von Teammitgliedern verfolgen, Workflows automatisieren und Nutzungsrichtlinien definieren. Die Lösung ermöglicht es Unternehmen, Pakete auf Schwachstellen zu scannen und die Einhaltung von Branchenvorschriften sicherzustellen. Darüber hinaus bietet die Lösung White-Label-Funktionen, mit denen Unternehmen die Nutzeroberfläche mit nutzerdefinierten Logos und Farben individuell anpassen können. MyGet enthält eine API, die die Integration verschiedener Plattformen Dritter wie Maven, Bower, Python, Ruby, TeamCity, NuGet, VSX, Jenkins und weiteren erleichtert. Das Produkt ist im Rahmen eines Monats- oder Jahresabonnements erhältlich und der Support erfolgt über Telefon, E-Mail und andere Onlineressourcen. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 71 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 71 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: IDERA - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 1.395,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 209 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Continuous Integration - Dashboard - Debuggen - Einsatz-Management - Genehmigungs-Workflow - KPI-Überwachung - Portfoliomanagement - Priorisierung - Release-Management - Richtlinien Managemen- - Software-Entwicklung - Web-App-Entwicklung - Werkzeuge zur Zusammenarbeit - Zugriffskontrollen / Berechtigungen ## Integrationen (2 insgesamt) - Jenkins - TeamCity ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support ## Category - [DevOps Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4380/devops/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [DevOps Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4380/devops/software) - [Programmiersoftware](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4499/app-development/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GitHub](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github) — 4.8/5 (6187 reviews) 2. [GitLab](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1223 reviews) 3. [Datadog](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/101405/datadog) — 4.6/5 (361 reviews) 4. [Octopus Deploy](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/347094/octopus-deploy) — 4.8/5 (60 reviews) 5. [PyCharm](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/207982/pycharm) — 4.7/5 (370 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "A Place for Managing All My Distribution Packages" — 4.0/5 > **Xiao** | *3. April 2020* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: - I can use it for free. - It supports importing NPM, Pypi, Nuget and Maven packages. - I can update packages without updating version numbers. > > **Nachteile**: Not like pypi.org, I can't upload multiple Python wheel packages, which are built for different platforms, in the same version number. > > It's good for testing my packages before publishing them to their official sites. ----- ### "Price level needs to be for OSS developers" — 4.0/5 > **Kouji** | *18. Mai 2022* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: \* Very easy to use management console. \* Can deploy and publish a NuGet package in 5 minutes. \* Very simple and clear configuration. \* No extra restrictions. > > **Nachteile**: \* The hierarchical structure of the repository is confusing. If the menu structure is organized, the problem will disappear. \* The pricing structure needs to be a bit more segmented, with a level where entry-level users do not hesitate to pay. free use is available for OSS use, which is great, but capacity restrictions are tight. Even if they want to pay to avoid this restriction, the current \`Developer\` seems expensive for OSS and hobby use. > > It has been a successful NuGet repository service for a long time, is reliable, and above all, very easy to use in terms of administration. I have 100% recomendation for using it, at least for OSS. Compared to the competition, it is neutral and easy to handle, with almost no constraints in terms of DevOps, and there is little reason to choose any other service. Pricing, however, is difficult to choose a level. In my case, I use OSS almost exclusively, but I'm willing to pay for it and charge for it. But the entry level \`Developer\` is expensive. For paid work, if a competitor is available for free, MyGet is rejected when I propose it. ----- ### "Ok Features. Ok Uptime." — 3.0/5 > **Christopher** | *3. April 2020* | Verbraucherdienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: MyGet has a very good interface for looking at your feeds. The API works. They just (March of this year 2020) added snupkgs support which is nice, but they're are a few competitors which have had this for a while. While this is true with most private package registries, the registration and authentication for your registry is very simple. > > **Nachteile**: The biggest difficulty for us with MyGet is their up-time. We depend on MyGet for a majority of our builds so when MyGet is down, most of our builds are down. This hit us ESPECIALLY hard during a release where we had the majority of a day (in November 2019) where we couldn't build. We actually moved some of our packages to GitHub Packages for the day so we could continue for a bit. As of 2018, new features (or at least posts about new features) have died down a bit. They appear to be either slowing down in new development or just simple not communicating as much. > > MyGet is one of the good 3 options for a package registry as a service in my humble opinion. That being said, I'd love to see more new features (or more communication) and better up-time. ----- ### "Best private package repository around" — 5.0/5 > **Jason** | *3. April 2020* | Hochschulbildung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: My team has been using MyGet for several years now. Before using MyGet we had a hodgepodge of homegrown private package repositories and it was a burden on our team to maintain them. Integrating MyGet into our toolstack and build servers was seamless and painless. Our team recouped valueable time after migrating to MyGet and was able to use that saved time towards actually writing our software. I'd say the best feature of MyGet is the wide support for different package sources. > > **Nachteile**: I wish there was a way to do Single Sign On through either SAML2P, Shibboleth or CAS. That's probably the only feature lacking right now that we really want. MyGet recently, in the grander scheme of things, implemented 2FA and that was a really big win for us. ----- ### "Was great...until we had a problem requiring support." — 4.0/5 > **Josh** | *13. Februar 2021* | Industrieautomation | Empfehlungsbewertung: 3.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Easy to set up, easy to use, and generally low cost. We got our feed set up and didn't touch it for a long time. > > **Nachteile**: At some point late 2020 our artifact size went over 100MG per build. We started getting rejections when trying to post it. The error message was clear, we needed to pay for more capacity. Ok, no problem. So we paid for more capacity...and the error didn't go away. We gave it a few days, still didn't correct itself. Contacted support. They made a ticket but there was no progress. This goes on for months. We are manually uploading builds this whole time (while paying the increased rate\!). Support keeps saying they can't help personally, they don't know when someone who can will look at it, and that's it. It totally sucked. > > We use it to distribute our software. New builds are posted on myget and installed with chocolatey. It was great, until the day it wasn't and then it was terrible. The complete and utter lack of ownership of the problem was the most frustrating part. I would not recommend myget to anyone based on this. We will move off of it without hesitation once we have an alternative. ----- Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/446021/myget?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/446021/myget) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten