--- description: Reviews zu Stack Internal Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche Stack Internal mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Stack Internal | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Content-Management-Systeme](/directory/4543/cms/software) > [Stack Internal](/software/417481/stackoverflow) # Stack Internal Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/417481/stackoverflow Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/417481/stackoverflow?page=2) > Stack Overflow for Teams ist ein Tool für Wissensaustausch und Kollaboration, das Unternehmen bei der Optimierung von Prozessen im Zusammenhang mit der Dokumentenbearbeitung, Gamification, Nutzer-Tagging und vielem mehr unterstützt. Mit dem Frage- und Antwortmodul von Stack Overflow können Mitarbeitende personalisierte Warnungen oder Aufgaben bei Anforderung von neuen Informationen generieren. Stack Overflow for Teams bietet darüber hinaus einen integrierten Editor, mit dem Mitarbeitende die Wissensdokumentation aktualisieren, veraltete Artikel identifizieren und bestimmte Fragen in Wissensartikeln kennzeichnen können. Mit dem Editor können Vorgesetzte auch Auszeichnungen/Bewertungen basierend auf der Menge der veröffentlichten Inhalte und der Erledigung anderer täglicher Aktivitäten unter den Teammitgliedern verteilen. Zur Rationalisierung von Workflows kann Stack Overflow for Teams problemlos in andere beliebte Tools von Dritten wie Slack, Teams, Jira, GitHub und Okta integriert werden. > > Bewertung: **4.7/5** von 70 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.7/5** | 70 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Stack Overflow - **Gegründet**: 2008 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 6,50 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) - **Zielgruppe**: 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Deutschland, Frankreich, Irland, Kanada, Niederlande, Schweden, Schweiz, Singapur, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich, Österreich ## Funktionen - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Catalog Management - Content-Management - Discussions/Forums - Dokumentenmanagement - Einmalige Anmeldung - Etikettierung - Kommunikationsmanagement - Remote-Support - Remote-Zugriff/-Kontrolle - Self-Service Portal - Suchen / filtern ## Integrationen (6 insgesamt) - GitHub - Jira - Microsoft Teams - Okta - Slack - Visual Studio Code ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Content-Management-Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4543/cms/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Content-Management-Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4543/cms/software) - [Home Office Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4592/remote-work/software) - [Collaboration Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4138/collaboration/software) - [Wissensmanagement Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/1884/knowledge-management/software) - [Wissensdatenbank Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/3898/knowledge-base/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Confluence](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/430492/confluence) — 4.5/5 (3663 reviews) 2. [Notion](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/123247/notion-remote-work) — 4.7/5 (2709 reviews) 3. [Guru](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/103160/guru) — 4.8/5 (639 reviews) 4. [Connecteam](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/109560/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5059 reviews) 5. [Slack](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/154669/slack) — 4.7/5 (24046 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Great Tool for our Software Development Team" — 5.0/5 > **Guy G.** | *12. Dezember 2018* | Gewerbeimmobilien | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Our Developers love the Stack Overflow tool(s). Frequently, we will go to Stack Overflow to pose a development question or seek guidance on how to proceed on our code base. The user community is wonderful and very helpful. > > **Nachteile**: We have nothing negative to state about this software. > > Our team has benefitted greatly from this tool. Our code is open source which helps us when we are seeking a better way to create enhancements in our application. The User community is very helpful and always provides great ideas for us to consider. ----- ### "Almost Perfect" — 4.0/5 > **Charles** | *7. November 2018* | Industrieautomation | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: First, let me be clear that it's not clear to me if this is about Stack Overflow or about Stack Overflow for Teams, the latter of which is what brought me to this survey. The survey here in particular says to write a review for "Stack Overflow" (not for Teams), so I'll say this: Somewhere on Stack Overflow is nearly every part of every program I've ever written. It's an absolutely indispensable resource for every programmer. > > **Nachteile**: I'm a Stack Overflow user and a Stack Exchange moderator. The most frustrating aspect of the site(s) is that the original asker is the only one that gets to pick the correct answer. OP's choice of answers gets pushed to the top regardless of community votes, and the question will be continuously bumped to the front page if the OP never picks an answer. I wish there were something like a "community accepted" answer, or a "de facto best answer" in the events where a question has been open for X days and has an answer with a score of Y but no accepted answers, or in the event where the top scored answer exceeds the score of the accepted answer by some magic ratio. > > I can kind of get with the idea that we're not supposed to post resources to Stack Overflow, but then I kind of also wish that there were some kind of a "curated" Stack Overflow, where it would be possible for "knowledgeable persons" (by reputation I'm sure) to accumulate "classic" questions and answers in a set of community references, especially such that you could see and easily browse related questions. I'm realizing now that this doesn't exactly address the "overall experience" I've had with SO, but I guess my point is that it can be kind of a pain to find quality related questions when I'm trying to find answers. Google results seem to be the way to go (because tags are generally far too superficial to be of much use), but then Google seems to optimize based on "famous" questions and really new questions, and I find the Google results keep regurgitating the same half-dozen or so questions (some results link the question, some results link the best answer, some results link the accepted answer, etc.). I've got more to say about this, but I feel like I'm digressing, so I'll just leave this comment as-is. ----- ### "The goodness of stack overflow for internal knowledge management" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *4. April 2019* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Stack overflow is quite famous for being the ONE place to look to when need technical help. Having an internal stack overflow promotes collaboration and helping others within the company. Knowledge management is critical, especially in smaller companies with less established processes and tools. We tried a number of different solutions, but are slowly centralizing on stack overflow. It integrates nicely with OAUTH and you can set team goals as an incentive to answering questions. > > **Nachteile**: While there is a stack overflow slack integration, it tends to be noisy and people tune it out. There needs to be a better way to push stack overflow questions to the right people. Unfortunately for now it is the same folks answering all of the questions, however this is an internal issue that we need to solve for. > > Overall nice but needs some tweaks to make it as successful for internal usage. ----- ### "Your own personal Stack Overflow" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *7. November 2018* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: If you're part of the tech world, you've almost certainly come across Stack Overflow. I use the site on a regular basis and was thrilled to find that they were creating a version that I could use for my own purposes. The UI is intuitive and easy to use and when coupled with the quality/voting system, this becomes a powerful tool for storing all of your key business information in a single place. Questions which are asked over and over again will be a thing of the past. It also features some useful moderation tools to ensure that your Team stays on track. Various different notification options also let you tailor what you hear about and how whilst integrating seamlessly into Stack Overflow. > > **Nachteile**: It is missing a few of the useful features for managing content quality that Stack Overflow has. The flagging controls and reviewing are missed. > > Especially in development teams, there's a lot of information silos - this software helps to break down these barriers and have a single place for all of the documentation relating to your product. ----- ### "Great knowledge base for organization." — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *30. November 2019* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I am very big fan of Stack overflow it started helping from my education and continuing now in my organization. Stack overflow for team is a great knowledge base , when you have some question but that was answered by other colleague long back, all is document and easily we can search about information. I can say it is wiki for organization. > > **Nachteile**: Really no negatives, But there are sometimes i can see duplicate questions, i think they can improve to detecting duplicate question while posting question or creating thread. > > Best documentation software that helps organization to document Question and Answers. ----- Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/417481/stackoverflow?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/417481/stackoverflow) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten