--- description: Reviews zu GitHub Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche GitHub mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: GitHub | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Source Code Control Systeme](/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) > [GitHub](/software/397820/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github Seite: 1 / 250\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github?page=2) > GitHub ist eine Projektmanagement- und Code-Sharing-Plattform, mit der Nutzer ihre Codes mit anderen teilen und mithilfe kollektiver Intelligenz erstellen/vervielfältigen können. Die Software lässt sich für verschiedene Arten von Codezuweisungen verwenden, einschließlich persönlicher, Open-Source- und Geschäftscodes. Erhältlich für den On-Premise- und cloudbasierten Einsatz. Nutzer können alle Versionen ihres Codes speichern und beispielsweise über Einladungen oder Erwähnungen mit anderen Nutzern kollaborieren. Entwickler können Communitys beitreten, in denen Open-Source-Projekte verfolgt werden. Fertige Codes lassen sich für Experimente, Hinweise und andere Projekte nutzen. Alle Beiträge in Open-Source-Projekten werden in Entwicklerprofilen aufgezeichnet. Unternehmen jeder Größe nutzen GitHub als integriertes Tool für die Codeentwicklung. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 6206 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 6206 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Microsoft - **Region**: Redmond, USA - **Gegründet**: 1975 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 4,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Belarus, Belgien, Brasilien, Bulgarien, China, Deutschland, Dänemark, Estland, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Indonesien, Irak, Island, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Kroatien, Lettland und 27 weitere ## Funktionen - @mentions - Agile Methodiken - Anfragenmanagement - Anwendungssicherheit - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Authentifizierung - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Bug-/Problemerfassung - Code-Bearbeitung - Code-Entwicklung - Codeprüfung - Continuous Integration - Dashboard - Daten-Import / -Export - Debuggen - Etikettierung - Feedback-Management ## Integrationen (15 insgesamt) - CircleCI - Docker - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) - [Continuous-Integration-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4694/continuous-integration/software) - [Online Projektmanagement Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/436/web-based/software) - [DevOps Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4380/devops/software) - [SAST-Tools (Static Application Security Testing)](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4429/sast/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/410128/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3017 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/4315/jira) — 4.4/5 (15498 reviews) 3. [GitLab](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1227 reviews) 4. [Airtable](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/205546/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2244 reviews) 5. [Odoo](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/77019/odoo-pos) — 4.2/5 (1334 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17. April 2026* | Sicherheit & Untersuchungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Nachteile**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "The Version Control Packed With Features" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *27. Mai 2026* | Konsumgüter | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: This version control makes coding, deployment and maintainance of repository easier for a team.The tool is also exceptional for automating workflows. Easy to integrate with other UI platforms such as source tree , making it user friendly. > > **Nachteile**: Permission and security management with access tokens can be complicated. For large enterprices, Github can be expensive. For a new user, advance features have a steap learning curve. > > overall, I have a positive experience with the platform. Github is a widely used version control platform helping team collaboration and clean coding. over the years, it has created a strong ecosystem of its own. The large online community makes the life of a user easier. ----- ### "best code management before microsoft acquisition" — 4.0/5 > **Terry** | *16. Mai 2025* | Metallabbau | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: best place for code management across different coders, the ability to control access and track issues is perfect for agile projects > > **Nachteile**: ever since the acquisition from microsoft, github becomes a tool to advertise microsoft products. I have to use microsoft authenticator to log in with stupid 2 factor authentication requirement. ----- ### "Good tool for code management but lacks some features when integrating with Confluence/Jira" — 3.0/5 > **Mark** | *3. Juni 2025* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: GitHub is a great tool to manage pull requests and being able to add labels in our teams helps to differentiate between urgent items which need reviews and are vital for the next release. > > **Nachteile**: One of the drawbacks with GitHub is integrating non development team members into a workflow process. Even though it is possible to setup a workflow too add approvers the terminology and UI is very developer based so can be a bit confusing to non development colleagues. > > Overall GItHub is a good tool for managing code, getting reviews and merging into the relevant branch ahead of deployment. There are some good integrations but it would be great if it could work more seamlessly with Confluence and Jira, and provide additional features to help automatically manage the correct states of the linked jira. ----- ### "GitHub: The Ultimate Tool for Version Control" — 5.0/5 > **Estrella** | *16. Juli 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Hosting repos is flawless, and features like pull requests and actions make daily CI/CD seamless. It's incredibly easy to use and is the gold standard for version control. > > **Nachteile**: Finding support is slow, and native project management features like Projects feel clunky compared to Jira. I also wish there were better built-in team chat options. > > I've used it daily for 10+ years for personal and work repos. It's stable, has very few bugs, offers incredible value for money, and is an essential tool in my coding life. ----- Seite: 1 / 250\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten