--- description: Reviews zu GitHub Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche GitHub mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: GitHub | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Source Code Control Systeme](/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) > [GitHub](/software/397820/github) # GitHub Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github Seite: 1 / 249\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github?page=2) > GitHub ist eine Projektmanagement- und Code-Sharing-Plattform, mit der Nutzer ihre Codes mit anderen teilen und mithilfe kollektiver Intelligenz erstellen/vervielfältigen können. Die Software lässt sich für verschiedene Arten von Codezuweisungen verwenden, einschließlich persönlicher, Open-Source- und Geschäftscodes. Erhältlich für den On-Premise- und cloudbasierten Einsatz. Nutzer können alle Versionen ihres Codes speichern und beispielsweise über Einladungen oder Erwähnungen mit anderen Nutzern kollaborieren. Entwickler können Communitys beitreten, in denen Open-Source-Projekte verfolgt werden. Fertige Codes lassen sich für Experimente, Hinweise und andere Projekte nutzen. Alle Beiträge in Open-Source-Projekten werden in Entwicklerprofilen aufgezeichnet. Unternehmen jeder Größe nutzen GitHub als integriertes Tool für die Codeentwicklung. > > Bewertung: **4.8/5** von 6198 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.8/5** | 6198 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.7/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Microsoft - **Region**: Redmond, USA - **Gegründet**: 1975 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 4,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Belarus, Belgien, Brasilien, Bulgarien, China, Deutschland, Dänemark, Estland, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Indonesien, Irak, Island, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Kroatien, Lettland und 27 weitere ## Funktionen - @mentions - Agile Methodiken - Anfragenmanagement - Anwendungssicherheit - Aufgaben-Fortschrittsverfolgung - Aufgabenmanagement - Authentifizierung - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Bug-/Problemerfassung - Code-Bearbeitung - Code-Entwicklung - Codeprüfung - Continuous Integration - Dashboard - Daten-Import / -Export - Debuggen - Etikettierung - Feedback-Management ## Integrationen (15 insgesamt) - CircleCI - Docker - Git - Heroku - JIRA Service Management - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Pivotal Tracker - Slack - Trello - Vercel - Visual Studio Code ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank ## Category - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) - [Continuous-Integration-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4694/continuous-integration/software) - [Online Projektmanagement Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/436/web-based/software) - [DevOps Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4380/devops/software) - [SAST-Tools (Static Application Security Testing)](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4429/sast/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GitLab](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab) — 4.6/5 (1226 reviews) 2. [Jira](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/4315/jira) — 4.4/5 (15459 reviews) 3. [Wrike](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/3777/wrike-pm) — 4.4/5 (3038 reviews) 4. [ClickUp](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/123064/clickup) — 4.6/5 (4620 reviews) 5. [Zoho Projects](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/392421/zoho-projects) — 4.5/5 (870 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "The undisputed standard for code collaboration and open source" — 4.0/5 > **Davide** | *17. April 2026* | Sicherheit & Untersuchungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: GitHub Actions is the CI/CD tool I prefer over any other. It is immediate, works extremely well, supports multiple operating systems, and even allows you to run self-hosted runners on-premises with minimal setup. What makes it truly powerful is the ecosystem: thousands of community-built, reusable actions exist for almost every use case, so you rarely have to reinvent the wheel. This saves an enormous amount of time day to day. Beyond Actions, the pull request workflow is excellent and the collaboration features — Issues and Discussions in particular — are extremely convenient and well-designed. GitHub is also the de facto standard for open source: almost every meaningful open source project lives here, and the fact that public repositories are free makes it the natural home for community-driven software. I use it both for my personal open source projects and at an enterprise level, and it handles both scenarios very well. The ability to host public and private repositories on the same platform without needing separate tools is a significant advantage. > > **Nachteile**: The project management section (GitHub Projects) still feels rough compared to dedicated tools like Linear. It works, but the UX is unintuitive and I usually reach for other tools when I need real project tracking. Issues and Discussions are great; Projects needs more work. Stability has also become a concern. GitHub has been experiencing more frequent outages lately. They are usually short, but they are disruptive — when your entire workflow depends on GitHub (pushing code, running pipelines, reviewing PRs), even brief downtime brings everything to a halt. Finally, the notification system is genuinely broken for my use case. The sheer volume of notifications makes it nearly impossible to find the ones that actually matter — a comment on your own issue, a review request, a mention. I often miss important updates unless someone tells me directly or I stumble across them manually. > > GitHub is a tool I would recommend to any team, regardless of size or industry. Small teams can get started for free; larger organizations can scale up to GitHub Enterprise. The platform works equally well for closed-source commercial projects and public open source repositories, and you never need to split your work across multiple tools. I would especially recommend it to anyone building or contributing to open source software — GitHub is the central hub where projects are born, grow, and gain traction. There is simply no better place to build in public. It is also worth noting that GitHub is not limited to software developers. Writers, researchers, and academics can benefit from version-controlled plain-text workflows (Markdown, LaTeX) managed through branches and releases — and modern AI tooling makes the learning curve much more approachable than it used to be. In short: I could not work without GitHub. Despite its rough edges, it remains the most complete and widely adopted platform for code collaboration and version control available today. ----- ### "Look No Further for Source Control" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *8. Dezember 2025* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Github makes it easy to store my code and collaborate with my teammates. The other Integrations that Github supports makes it easy to run linting, tests, deployments, and more with Github actions. It is my favorite source control software, and the free accounts that it allows make it a really good value. Setup is a breeze with Github, and makes it so you can get a repository setup in no time. > > **Nachteile**: If you're newer to github then using some of the tools it provides can be overwhelming, but github makes other tools to support that. > > I've used Github for about 5 years, and it's been great since I started. It allows me to easily collaborate with my teammates, and keep each other from stepping on toes while working. I would have a very hard time doing my job without Github, and the other options available are inferior for various reasons. ----- ### "best code management before microsoft acquisition" — 4.0/5 > **Terry** | *16. Mai 2025* | Metallabbau | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: best place for code management across different coders, the ability to control access and track issues is perfect for agile projects > > **Nachteile**: ever since the acquisition from microsoft, github becomes a tool to advertise microsoft products. I have to use microsoft authenticator to log in with stupid 2 factor authentication requirement. ----- ### "Good for work examples" — 3.0/5 > **Jade** | *19. April 2025* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: As a recruiter it was helpful for work examples and able to show hiring managers the candidates skillset > > **Nachteile**: If your not a developer it can be quite hard to navigate and understand > > Okay but could be better in terms of a non developer using it ----- ### "Perfect for all sizes of projects" — 5.0/5 > **🧑‍💻 Owain** | *6. April 2026* | Internet | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I enjoy working with GitHub due to its ease of use and that so many people use it so there are tons of online resources available if you get stuck trying to set something up > > **Nachteile**: Sometimes swapping between repos can be cumbersome. If you have multiple organisations it's not always a smooth transition between repos > > I enjoy working with GitHub so much that we've recently migrated all our bitbucket repos to GitHub. It's great that we can keep client repos private but still show our activity on our own personal accounts ----- Seite: 1 / 249\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten