
Conclusion
Über Conclusion






Conclusion Preis
Conclusion bietet keine Gratisversion, aber eine kostenlose Testversion.
Alternativen für Conclusion
Alle Bewertungen zu Conclusion Filter anwenden
Nutzerbewertungen zu Conclusion durchsuchen
Alle Bewertungen zu Conclusion Filter anwenden
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Best platform to develop digital products
The main problem is communications between customers, product and project managers and our development team. Before implementation we had to use different systems for each team, make use a lot of email and messengers, constantly loosing track of tasks and documents.
Eller helped us to move to single platform and to keep track of all tasks and finance, we improved our discipline and customer satisfaction.
Vorteile
The Eller has almost unique blend of task manager, instant messenger and powerful project management and Service desk functionality. We can have our development process in the same system without need to switch between different non-integrated applications.
The user interface is also brilliant, it's very fast, lightweight and intuitive.
Eller is a highly customisable platform, we have setup all our processes and customised forms to capture required data.
Nachteile
The software is quite expensive, but affordable comparing to competitors.
- Branche: Verbraucherdienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
complex solution for very good price
Vorteile
Different areas like Project management, SD, CRM connected into one system with very good logic behind.
Nachteile
Reporting could by better or some connectors to PowerBI or Excel would be great.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
JiraWarum Conclusion gewählt wurde
To manage processes in more standardize way, to get efficient processesTo share information in one system wihin the companyEliminate e-mail communicationTo manage Projects in standardize way - Agile as well as Waterfall type of projectsGründe für den Wechsel zu Conclusion
Better TCOBetter score of build-in SW functionality from requested finctionality- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Good tool for end-to-end process
Testing and operation team is using it daily and are satisfy with usage. For new users it is taking significant time to get to daily routine workflow
Vorteile
Easy processes once setuped, possible integration to many other tools
Nachteile
Design and clear user journeys for not daily-used users is not easy. Configuration for non-tech advanced people is hard to achieve. Not enough detailed documentation
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
JiraGründe für den Wechsel zu Conclusion
Price options and easy integration withing other company systems- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Fast deployment and customization.
We use and implement conclusion for more then 6 years. Conclusion was wervy flexiblem, usefull and integrated tool from very begining but most interesting thing is continual improvement, new modules, new featues, rich and easier configuration.
Vorteile
Initial installation can be deployed and configured in hours. Users/Admins are able to customize and even develop new functionalities within hours or few days.
Nachteile
There are many features and possibilities of configuration which may in the beginning cause the product very complex and difficult to use. There is no single or general methodology implemented in the basic configuration and it requires someone who strictly defines the processes.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Conclusion to Conclusion
Conclusion is a large product with many interesting features.
We like the simplicity of the technical deployment.
Like any similar system, it brings with it difficulties with changes in user procedures, adaptation to product features, or the need to modify the product according to the needs of the organization.
For us, the ability to customize and adapt to our needs is very interesting. This feature allows us to go both ways.
Vorteile
Efficient, very functional and customizable UI
Low-code concept
Useful integration to other systems
A lot of standard features and function for demand, project management
Interesting Task management with workflow
Good notification system
Nachteile
Improve UI features for low-code editing (better GUI editor, improve JS console)
Improve gantt UI
Improve program management
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Conclusion is Cooperation
Working with the people who created Conclusion is very inspiring and I enjoy it.
Vorteile
Conclusion is very user friendly, very fast (real time data updates) and its use is intuitive and simple. It is easily configurable. Objects can be connected easily and working with Lifecycles is great. The possibilities for collaboration are amazing.
Nachteile
Integration with business processes is not easy, because it was necessary to develop functionalities that conslusion did not have yet. So it was necessary to develop relatively many functionalities, or finish them off. But this is more a question of correct and clear specifications from the client's side.
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
JiraWarum Conclusion gewählt wurde
Because of Lotus Notes :-)- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Excellent tool for supporting all key IT processes
We have been using the Conclusion for 4 years and gradually we implemented full scope of available modules and functions. The Conclusion helps us to be more efficient and productive and we saved investment about 20% (no needed any additional supporting applications) and operational costs about almost 30% (due to supporting costs and license maintenance costs). We can plan and synchronize projects each other, supervise test progress and deployment on production. The Conclusion provide us with all needed data for decision making and control our IT environment effectively.
Vorteile
- a comprehensive and compact IT management support tool
- collaborative platform for business and IT staff
- unique solution for business analysis preparation
- effective sharing of all data for making decision
- seamless integration of all modules
- easy implementation and fast adoption
Nachteile
- there are no major flaws or issues
- be aware that all comprehensive solutions require a preparation and effort
- Branche: Rundfunkmedien
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Eller Software in DCIT
Vorteile
Eller software is easy to use. Improved our communication with customers and partners as well as internal processes.
The system greatly reduced email sending.
It is very intuitive and easy to administrate the system.
The system is modern.
Nachteile
At the moment, I can't remember any major system flaws. It probably means that I am satisfied with the system.
- Branche: Informationsdienst
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Nice tool for Requirement and Project Management
Vorteile
What surprised me the most was scalability and the speed of Eller application.
Nachteile
Well, what bothers me the most is disability of easily opening pages into new tab and missing friendly url. That would help me to work even faster and friendly URL would give me better understanding where I am (especially at the beginning of using the application)
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
Jira- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Revolution framework and complete system
IT-service support management, lifecycle management settings and customizations.
IT-equipment service company processes automatization through entire lifecycle: asset, workforce management, customer support, reporting.
Integration of Conclusion Platform with financial system (procurements and stock processes) and Billing system (providing by Customer).
Vorteile
Simple in understanding, using, integration and customizing working spaces.
Easy to start.
The new philosophy of project approach.
Online data update.
High performance.
New approach in IT-architecture and data access.
Nachteile
The product is new developed.
There is not much information on the Internet about it.
We had to use vendor support during the project implementation
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Very robust system which helps you to achieve almost everything
We are using the Conclusion for project management, software development, gitlab hook management, service interventions (car management) and service desk.
I recommend to implement you processes one by one. The system is only that good as good was your preparation for configuration. Illogical decisions can lead to poor user experience. Just ask the support if you are not sure.
Vorteile
It is a very flexible and configurable system. You can configure it into almost every shape you like. Do you want to have a register of something with a life cycle, integration and automation? Put it into Conclusion.
Nachteile
It may be difficult to set up all processes initially.
Antwort von Eller
Thank you very much for positive feedback!
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Conclusion is the BEST!
We are using a lot of different functionalities of Conclusion system, and everything works perfectly.
Vorteile
It's really easy to manage and deploy new features. Totally user-friendly tool with a lot of functionalities
Nachteile
Till now we didn't find anything 'bad' or 'heavy' to manage. Everything is just perfect!
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Vildana's Conclusion rewiew
We are solving all network issues, reporting and tracking incident and getting statistics
Vorteile
It is so easy to use! Really colorful and organized,simple but yet professional !
Nachteile
Everything was good, maybe creating some roles and permissions we a bit confusing.
- Branche: Unternehmensberatung
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Connecting business and IT
We currently use Conclusion to better manage requests from our clients related to a support of our software solutions. We have also run a proof of concept for demand management and project management modules. I believe that Conclusion is well positioned to solve the following business-IT problems:
• Lack of governance around demand intake and prioritization
• Inefficient IT delivery leading to business dissatisfaction
• Inadequate capacity planning and utilization of resources
• Inefficient requirements management
Vorteile
I see the biggest advantage of Conclusion in its ability to enable both business and IT users to collaborate more easily and efficiently. Moreover, the user interface is simply great and incredibly fast. Conclusion offers a bunch of functionality and ready to use processes in all crucial areas of business and IT collaboration such as a service desk, demand management, requirements management, project management, capacity planning or testing. This is an advantage especially when you do not have these processes supported by any tool. Even though you already use some commonly used tools Conclusion has built-in adapters. Last, but not least it is a highly configurable application which needs minimum hardware requirements. This makes its implementation faster and cheaper.
Nachteile
While some of the functional modules offer enough out-of-the-box functionality, there are several areas, e.g. program portfolio management or demand prioritization, that will likely require more customization when implemented in a larger enterprise.
- Branche: Versorgungsunternehmen
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Configurable
Vorteile
Easy to configure by our internal team.
Nachteile
Some modules are not pre-configured (customer must have internal vision about proces that is going to be implemented).
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
All in one system
Thanks to Conclusion , we were able to decommission five legacy systems.
Vorteile
System is designed with respect to real users and our experience. We can always discuss new requests and our needs. Vendor is ready to adopt our proposals into the product roadmap. New features regularly appear in the product.
Nachteile
Some configurations are still "half coding", nicer GUI would help.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
My Conclusion Experience
Vorteile
This software is very flexible. Very easy to configure
Nachteile
The product was not localized for Kazakh language, but actualty it was not a big problem
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Easy-to-implement and well-structured product.
It was easy to integrate the CRM system into our business processes. One of the most fascinating things is the tech support, which is more helpful than you can expect.
Vorteile
It's one of the most adjustable CRM system. The customization level helps to meet almost any business need. The other big plus is a relatively low threshold for administrators for maintain the system.
Nachteile
The documentation for developers and admins could be more comprehensive.