
Zendesk QA
Über Zendesk QA











Zendesk QA Preis
Zendesk QA bietet keine Gratisversion, aber eine kostenlose Testversion.
Alternativen für Zendesk QA
Alle Bewertungen zu Zendesk QA Filter anwenden
Nutzerbewertungen zu Zendesk QA durchsuchen
Alle Bewertungen zu Zendesk QA Filter anwenden

- Branche: Verbraucherdienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great C-SAT Software
Vorteile
My managers use this tool to provide me with quality assurance scoring on selected cases that we work on. My cases are imported from Front and allows me to view the entire conversation thread and the specific reply that I was graded for within Klaus. There is a section for me to view the breakdown of my scorecard and any comments my manager left, along with a comment section to leave my own comments. The dashboard is also very detailed and allows me to see my scores for different periods and I also get the alerts when I am scored to my slack along with my email. There are a lot of things that can, no doubt, be accomplished by using Klaus that would save you the time of having to hammer though excel to create the perfect scoring sheet.
Nachteile
I have not had to use it it in a manner so as to have a bad experience with the software. It's simple and efficient.
- Branche: Freizeit, Reisen & Tourismus
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Qualitista wins!
Vorteile
We adopted Qualitista after shopping other CX QA programs for a few reasons. As a company that was finally outgrowing our home-grown QA solutions, we wanted to find an affordable system that included integrations with our CRM software (Kustomer), had a very responsive team to support & help us grow in our QA journey, and had an easy-to-use interface. We didn't need all of the bells & whistles that some of the pricier options included, but we did like the idea of being an early adopter with a newer startup that would prioritize our needs in building their roadmap. We've found exactly that - exceptional response to questions, quick fixes when something goes wrong, and a willingness to partner with us rather than "manage" our process.
Nachteile
Sometimes the speed to roll out new features overtakes our communication, but it's definitely gotten better :)
In Betracht gezogene Alternativen
PlayvoxGründe für den Wechsel zu Zendesk QA
Pricing, direct line to managers, and integration with our CRM.- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Best of Zendesk QA
This platform provides a structured way to manage quality assurance, making it easier to track and evaluate customer interactions.
Vorteile
zendesk QA is used for process that evaluates customer service conversations to ensure they meet quality and reliability standards,
Nachteile
endesk's QA tools may not offer deep customization for specific workflows, making it challenging to adapt automated testing for unique business needs.
- Branche: Marketing & Werbung
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Zendesk, a great helpdesk one can ever experience
Vorteile
1. Super easy to learn and implement
2. Great dashboard and simple commands for actions
3. Effective Realtime tracking ad monitoring
Nachteile
1. A bit expensive
2. Multi-login sessions are not supported( Web and phone together while travelling)
- Branche: Verbraucherdienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Zendesk QA is great for quality check purposes, recommended.
It has been great for writing quality audits since it makes it easier with the web browser extension. I can look at the ticket that I'm auditing while writing the review and have the complete functionality of the complete webpage. Really great!
Vorteile
Easy solution for making reviews or quality audits on coworkers. It keeps track of everything, being able to link it with our ticketing system and create custom scorecards. Great stuff with a good sense of humor.
Nachteile
Filtering reports can be quite bothersome if there are a lot of agents to search from since the interface gets quite slow.

- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Manager reviews, peer reviews, cross departamental reviews - all the reviews
Qualitista helps us to encourage peer reviews and cross-team learning for support agents. Constant peer reviews have increased trust and facilitated knowledge sharing.
Onboarding time has been reduced as it allows new agents to review "successful" tickets (instead of only seeing open = unsolved cases in the queue).
Codifying how we define quality has helped us to create training material and a joint vocabulary around how we solve customer queries.
Vorteile
* Ease of onboarding
* Versatility of use (adaptable to different needs, even within the same account different teams can use it as they see fit
* Customer service
Nachteile
* Documentation/Knowledge base is yet to be fully developed

- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Kostenlose Testversion genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
The Review
One of kind product which just a pleasure to use. Definitely recommend for big customer support teams.
Vorteile
It makes giving feedback to the customer support team so convenient that it's actually enjoyable. Amazing reports are just a cherry on the cake.
Nachteile
Can't say anything bad besides the price tag. It's quite heavy for a small team who could handle to QA without the tool
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
AMAZING PRODUCT! A REAL QUALITY ASSURANCE PRODUCT!
We needed a good Quality Assurance system for our ZenDesk. We tried to make notes in tickets but it got messy and we don't have any way of reporting on performance. After Qualitista, we can easily see a performance and make metric reports on team/individual levels. Thank you so much for making this product!
Vorteile
- Visibility on every level
- Customizable on the fly
- Best customer service
- Easy implementation
- Reps are THE BEST!!!!
Nachteile
NOTHING! There is nothing wrong with this product. Everything is amazing! Don't even think twice. GO WITH QUALITISTA!
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great tool for great support teams
Vorteile
It saves you a lot of time on tickets review and helps to keep track of agents performance in one place.
User friendly design and ease of use!
Nachteile
Nothing in particular, we had a few glitches with the tool when we started but they are all gone now and everything works smoothly.

- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Very useful
Decent product with great support. They are developing features fast - bright future ahead, wise choice.
Vorteile
I like how it works with Intercom and how our agents find it useful.
Nachteile
It's a pretty fresh product still I didn't find anything major that would make me complain.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Klaus has the best UI in the business.
I like the UI and I particularly like the reporting it allows. It goes quite deep.
Vorteile
We just moved over to Klaus a few months ago and it has helped my team track our teams' performance more accurately.
Nachteile
It takes a minute to get acquainted with it but then it rocks.
- Branche: Konsumgüter
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Game Changer
Vorteile
The platform is easy to use and set-up. It has been valuable with coaching and providing feedback to the agents. I also love how they are constantly improving the platform.
Nachteile
I wish that the coaching form was more customizable.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Bitsgap success story
Klauss has opened us a way to interact with our support team and create a development scorecard, performance review procedures, and follow the progress of our agents in the long and short term. This has already eliminated a whole lot of problems with underperformance and highlighted the success of top notch support agents. Thank you for that!
Vorteile
Features that our support channel service doesn't provide: random selection of tickets, advanced filters, conversation rating, conversation timeline, convenient tag usage
Nachteile
For someone who starts with a conversation QA it is hard to decide where to begin and how to set-up everything. I would say that in-platform tours would be a good feature to have.
The other thing are ratings, while 3 point ratings don't reveal much of the information, the 5 point system is too much. The 4 point rating would be a good fit for our company so we can distinguish feedback in the following ratings: Bad, Ok, Good, Wow
Antwort von Zendesk
Thank you, Ervin, for the review
Klaus actually has a 4-point rating scale in the options as well. You can find it in the Rating scale setting.
Let us know if you need any help setting that up.
- Branche: Logistik & Lieferkette
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Time Saving and So Helpful
My experience with Qualitista has been absolutely stellar. I get a message when something in the app isn't working correctly. I'm able to request features directly to the folks who are building it. This is why I can't really say anything I don't like about it. Anyone who purports to understand anything about technology knows that it's constantly changing and getting better. We've been on the platform for almost two months and things are getting better with regularity. This a great product and I recommend it to anyone who really values their time.
Vorteile
Qualitista has been a life saver! I'm the Training and Quality Specialist for an app startup and this is a new position for the company. We still don't know some of things that I'm going to be responsible for, but I have so many ideas. The way I was doing ticket assessments before took SO much time that I couldn't work on anything else. I saw Qualitista and was instantly excited about the time I was going to save and the depth in which I'd be able to get with assessing our team members. The progress tracking, the feedback communication, all of it in one place? This program has helped me SO much!
Nachteile
I haven't found anything I don't like about it so far.
- Branche: Verbraucherdienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
It's awesome!
We are quickly able to confirm who is excelling in certain areas versus who needs improvement. Getting notified via slack immediately when reps respond is really nice as well. It allows us to address concerns right away as they come in. We really get to see the big picture at a glance which helps the entire team grow.
Vorteile
The software is very user friendly. I can easily manage and view statistics for individuals.
Nachteile
So far, I really like the software. Occasionally we have outages however it's addressed right away when notified to your support team. The customer service all around is awesome.
- Branche: Finanzdienstleistungen
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great !
Keep me accountable, and makes marking fun and engaging. Great for getting buy-in and also colleagues on board. Quiz features are also great and the short courses they provide and the community is a perfect addition.
Vorteile
It's fun, and super intuitive and the customer service is great - all great things to make a product truly work for you.
Nachteile
The only thing I have slight issues with would be the delay in CSAT being pulled and sent and the conversation filters aren't as customisable as I'd like, but this doesn't deter from the overall experience.
- Branche: Verbraucherdienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
K-Cat review
Overall experience with Klaus is positive, as it allows to give and receive the feedback of daily tasks easily.
Vorteile
Klaus is very easy to use to set up all the different things a company would need to include to give reviews, comments and feedback on the employee's work in a certain period of time. Accessibility to have this software integrated is set up nicely, and is not complicated.
Also, it is comfortable to have the results and feedback displayed in various ways, whether in a table or grid view, it is a really thoughtful feature to be included for everyone.
Nachteile
At times, it may be glitchy and repetitive work is required, however, it all depends on each section, so no major complaints about this.
- Branche: Rundfunkmedien
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
How Klaus Makes QA Feedback A Great Experience
Klaus enabled us to personalize feedbacks and empower both the Evaluator and the Receiver an equal opportunity to discuss a Specific Conversation. This scenario is definitely a top choice for startups or even Enterprise companies alike.
Vorteile
Being able to access Klaus anywhere at any time is really handy as I can check on my latest or previous QA feedbacks when I need it.
Nachteile
It does not load as fast as I would expect from a web application that is integrated with our chat tool but it still does the job pretty well given the few seconds of wait time.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Klaus is great!
Vorteile
I love the ease of use for organizing and reviewing conversations! It really makes a potentially messy job super easy by stripping out all of the customer's data and just allowing us to focus on the content! It's really helped!!
Nachteile
It was kind of confusing at first but once I got the hang of it was great! It didn't take long to get up to speed.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Excellent conversation review tool
Vorteile
Platform that is very easy and fun to use. Friendly and clean UI with everything that we need in one place. Their customer support is just awesome - very responsive!
Nachteile
We haven't encountered any dealbreaking issues.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great tool
Vorteile
Klaus is really user friendly. It makes QA amongst my teammates really valuable. We hadn’t used any other tools before and Klaus has proven to be what works best on both ends. Their support team is great too.
Nachteile
I don’t have any complaints or cons. It’s great
- Branche: Marktforschung
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great Product
Vorteile
The customer support is top notch and issues are addressed and resolved quickly.
Nachteile
The feature set isn't there yet, but they are constantly adding new features and the team is responsive to suggestions and areas for improvement.
Antwort von Zendesk
Thank you for your review and support