--- description: Reviews zu Ansys medini analyze Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche Ansys medini analyze mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Ansys medini analyze | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Sicherheitsmanagement Software](/directory/4699/safety-management/software) > [Ansys medini analyze](/software/323251/ansys-medini-analyze) # Ansys medini analyze Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/323251/ansys-medini-analyze Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/323251/ansys-medini-analyze?page=2) > Ansys medini analyze ist ein modellbasiertes, integriertes Tool, das Sicherheitsanalysen für sicherheitskritische E/E (Electrical/Electronic)- und SW (Software)-gesteuerte Systeme unterstützt. Die Lösung ermöglicht eine konsistente und effiziente Anwendung von Industrierichtlinien, die speziell auf Industriestandards zugeschnitten sind, wie ISO 26262, IEC 61508, ARP 4761, ISO 21448 oder MIL-STD-882E. > > Bewertung: **4.0/5** von 23 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.0/5** | 23 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.8/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Ansys - **Gegründet**: 1970 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - Ad-hoc-Berichterstattung - Datenvisualisierung - Risikobewertung - Vorfall-Berichterstattung - Workflow-Konfiguration ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Sicherheitsmanagement Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4699/safety-management/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Sicherheitsmanagement Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4699/safety-management/software) - [Reporting-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4284/reporting-tools/software) - [Workflow Management Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4272/workflow/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Jira](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/4315/jira) — 4.4/5 (15371 reviews) 2. [monday.com](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/131008/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6037 reviews) 3. [Asana](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/5576/asana) — 4.5/5 (13574 reviews) 4. [Zapier](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/163639/zapier) — 4.7/5 (3050 reviews) 5. [Connecteam](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/109560/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5213 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Easy to use and understand for other engineering functions" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *19. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: So clear understanding report outs. Other functions can understand contributions and results as well. > > **Nachteile**: Lite version can be developed to gain time for modeling. Library development can be added. ----- ### "Ideal tool for FS" — 5.0/5 > **Ludwig** | *11. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The possibility to develop the complete product lifecycle for FS, CS and SOTIF > > **Nachteile**: There is no straight way to follow the V-cycle process. It is required to jump from a project item to another one continuously to fulfill all the docs > > It takes time to learn but it is easy to maintain and complete the required documents ----- ### "HQN review of Medini Analyze" — 3.0/5 > **Hung** | *24. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: We use all features of Functional Safety analysis. Medini allows us to have all these analysis to be coherently located in a single model. The tool is relatively easy to use. But, create templates to tailor the tool to our existing process is challenging if not impossible without expert help from Ansys. Currently, we cannot integrate Medini with our other tools except by exporting/importing via MS Excel or MS Word. And, this process is cumbersome and prone to errors. > > **Nachteile**: Limited SysML capability to model Systems/Items and Functional Safety work products in Medini. > > We are using Medini to implement our Functional Safety Process. Overall, the tools is acceptable. It gets the jobs done with ad hoc works-around that must be manually recreated in different models. Should use SysML or at least UML as template in the same fashion as Sparx System's Enterprise Architect or IBM's Rhapsody. ----- ### "Ansys medini analyze review from a safety and security user point of view" — 4.0/5 > **Samuele** | *12. November 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The most impactful features are the possibility to manage most of the safety life development of a product inside a single tool. Is possible to define an item definition, HARA, derive SG, create functional safety and technical safety concepts, link requirements, perform FMEA, FMEDA, FTA. All in a single environmel and with deep in treacibility. From last version it also features security actvitity. It also integrable with other company tool beacuse it support othe rrequirement managent tool import export (for example Doors). > > **Nachteile**: BIRT, the add in integrated to create custom report template, is not easy to use and require some javascript programming knowledge. The user manual of BIRT contains very minimal informations and the only source of help is the Medini forum. > > The expereience is good. We now use it to speed up functional safety and cybersecurity activities for various projects. ----- ### "Goiing Good and Need Improvements" — 4.0/5 > **Tony** | *9. Dezember 2021* | Automotive | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: it covers most of the safety activities and a change done in one activity could reflect on other levels/ activities too. > > **Nachteile**: Tool take more memory and hangs a lot. Also Medini dont have user friendly options, compare to the classic tools we used for analysis, in particularly where FMEA/FMEDAs even a copy paste is not supported. > > The idea is good to have all safety activities in the same tool. still Medini have many blockings for new users, where they feel more easy on the old classic tools than Medini. ----- Seite: 1 / 2\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/323251/ansys-medini-analyze?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/323251/ansys-medini-analyze) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten