--- description: Reviews zu GitLab Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche GitLab mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: GitLab | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Agiles Projektmanagement Tools](/directory/3139/agile/software) > [GitLab](/software/28004/gitlab) # GitLab Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab Seite: 1 / 50\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab?page=2) > GitLab ist eine cloudbasierte Projektmanagementplattform, mit der Softwareentwickler Codes gemeinsam entwickeln und verwalten können. Die Plattform kann entweder on premise oder in der Cloud bereitgestellt werden. GitLab hilft Entwicklerteams, den gesamten Code-Lebenszyklus zu verwalten, von der Einführung einer Idee bis zur Bereitstellung von Code bei der Produktion. Zu den wichtigsten Funktionen von GitLab gehören Git-Repository-Management, Code-Überprüfung, Problemverfolgung, Aktivitätsfeeds und Audit-Protokolle. Die Software wird in vier verschiedenen Editionen angeboten: Community Edition, Enterprise Edition, GitLab.com und GitLab.io. Nutzer können ihre Codes in das Repository hochladen. GitLab bietet auch eine Repository-Spiegelungsfunktion, mit der Nutzer mithilfe der GitLab-Schnittstelle auf ein Repository auf einem anderen Server zugreifen können. Mit der Code-Überprüfungsfunktion können Nutzer Code Zeile für Zeile auswerten und Kommentare abgeben. Die Software bietet außerdem CI (Continuous Integration) und CD (Continuous Delivery), um Codes zu testen, zu entwickeln und bereitzustellen. Die Enterprise Edition der Software bietet automatisierte Tests, Git-Hooks, Audit-Trails und Administratorfunktionen. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 1226 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 1226 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: GitLab - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 29,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch, Japanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Albanien, Algerien, Amerikanisch-Samoa, Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Andorra, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua und Barbuda, Argentinien, Armenien, Aruba, Aserbaidschan, Australien, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Barbados, Belarus, Belgien und 205 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Anwendungssicherheit - Audit Trail - Aufgabenliste - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenmanagement - Authentifizierung - Automated Testing - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung / Projektverfolgung - Code-Bearbeitung - Code-Repository-Integration - Codeprüfung - Compliance Management - Continuous Integration - Datenbank-Unterstützung - Datensicherheit ## Integrationen (39 insgesamt) - Akismet - Anchore - Asana - Assembla - Bamboo - Beyond Identity - Bitbucket - Bridgecrew - Bugzilla - Buildkite - Campfire Blaze - Checkmarx One - Datadog - Deepfactor - Discord ... und 24 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Agiles Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/3139/agile/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Agiles Projektmanagement Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/3139/agile/software) - [Projektmanagement Tools für Marketing](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/1815/marketing/software) - [Online Projektmanagement Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/436/web-based/software) - [Projektmanagement Software für kleine Unternehmen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/3618/small-business/software) - [Source Code Control Systeme](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4322/source-code-management/software) ## Alternativen 1. [GitHub](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/397820/github) — 4.8/5 (6198 reviews) 2. [Microsoft Visual Studio](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/410128/microsoft-visual-studio) — 4.6/5 (3012 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/4315/jira) — 4.4/5 (15460 reviews) 4. [Airtable](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/205546/airtable) — 4.6/5 (2243 reviews) 5. [Odoo](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/77019/odoo-pos) — 4.2/5 (1323 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Overtaken Github" — 5.0/5 > **Samuel** | *15. August 2026* | Finanzdienstleistungen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It's syntax is very extendable and there's very little that it cannot do. the YAML anchor templating is extremely useful > > **Nachteile**: I think the cloud hosted option is not as good as the self-hosted version for some reason, and feature releases seem quite slow > > Very positive, given Githubs recent performance I would put Gitlab as one of the best SCM systems, and it's CI/CD integration is unmatched. ----- ### "Suitable for large deployments, and always improving." — 4.0/5 > **Roke** | *29. September 2025* | Verteidigung & Raumfahrt | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It allows users and organisations to organise their repositories into (hierarchical) directories, unlike Forgejo and GitHub. Additionally, like Forgejo, but unlike GitHub, it provides an issue tracker, which is moderated. > > **Nachteile**: SAAS GitLab's spam detection is aggressive when modifying Snippets containing significant amounts of content. Additionally, although it provides a useful issue tracker, and public forum for personal issues (and GitHub has recently reduced the level of support that its agents are meant to provide), GitLab offers no private, personal (account) support. > > My interactions with staff at their issue tracker are generally very positive, although they are at times slow to respond, and a little apathetic about finer details. ----- ### "A solid project management platform with a great free tier" — 4.0/5 > **Anilu** | *7. Juli 2026* | Programmentwicklung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: GitLab is a robust platform for managing software development projects. It offers a high level of flexibility and a wide range of features that can adapt to projects of different sizes and complexities. One of its biggest advantages is the availability of a free tier, which is ideal for startups or companies that want to evaluate the platform before investing in a paid plan. > > I believe GitLab has room for improvement in its user interface. While it is highly functional, it could provide more visual dashboards and reporting for project timelines, progress percentages, and overall project status. This would make it easier to present project updates to executives and improve the overall user experience. ----- ### "A complete development tool that improves workflow" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *3. Mai 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I liked most about GitLab is that it feels like everything is in one place. Instead of switching between different tools for code, pipelines, and task tracking, it is all integrated, which saves time and reduces a lot of small frustrations. From a cost perspective, that also makes it a good value because you are not paying for multiple separate services. It took a little time to get used to the layout, but once it clicked, it became pretty straightforward to use. Moving between projects, issues, and pipelines feels natural. The built in code editor is handy for quick fixes or reviewing changes without opening another tool, which I found myself using more than expected. Task tracking is well thought out. Issues, boards, and milestones connect nicely, so it is easy to see what needs to be done and what is already in progress. It helps keep things organized, especially when working with a team. Performance has been reliable for me. Pipelines run without much delay, and I did not run into major slowdowns even on larger projects. The CI/CD setup is one of the stronger parts, since it makes building and deploying much smoother once everything is configured. Customer support has been decent, but honestly, I did not need to reach out much because the documentation usually answers most questions. When I did look things up, the guides were clear enough to follow without much confusion. Overall, GitLab feels like a practical, all in one solution that covers most development needs without overcomplicating things. > > **Nachteile**: One downside for me was that GitLab can feel a bit overwhelming at first. There is a lot going on, and it takes some time to figure out where everything is. The interface is okay, but not always the cleanest. Sometimes it feels a bit cluttered, and simple things can take a few extra clicks to find. Setting up pipelines can also be a bit frustrating, especially in the beginning. Even small mistakes in the config can break things, and it is not always clear what went wrong. I also noticed that it can be a little slow at times, mostly when working on bigger projects or loading certain pages. The documentation is helpful, but sometimes it feels too long, so finding quick answers is not always easy. > > Overall, my experience with GitLab has been positive. It feels like a solid, all in one platform that covers most of what is needed for development without having to rely on too many external tools. There was a bit of a learning curve in the beginning, especially with things like pipelines and navigating all the features, but once I got used to it, it became much easier to work with. Day to day tasks like managing code, reviewing changes, and tracking issues feel smooth and organized. It has been reliable for the most part, and I like that everything from code to deployment can be handled in one place. It is not perfect and has a few rough edges, but overall it gets the job done well and makes team collaboration easier. ----- ### "Experience with gitlab" — 5.0/5 > **sirjan** | *15. Juni 2025* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I've been using GitLab since the start of my career, and honestly, it's just so good. While there isn’t a huge difference between GitLab and GitHub in terms of core functionality, GitLab really stands out when you're working within a closed group or using it in an organization. The built-in CI/CD, issue tracking, and permission controls make it incredibly smooth for team collaboration and managing private repositories efficiently. For internal projects and streamlined workflows, GitLab has been my go-to > > **Nachteile**: While GitLab offers a lot of great features, one thing that can be limiting—especially for startups—is that many essential features are locked behind the paid tiers. For example, creating a group and being able to add only a few members in the free version feels a bit restrictive when you're trying to scale a small team. Similarly, features like advanced branch protection rules, which are quite important for maintaining code quality and workflows, aren't fully available in the free plan. It would be great if GitLab could offer more flexibility for early-stage teams who rely on these core features to build solid development practices. > > Overall, my experience with GitLab has been great. I’ve been using it since the beginning of my career, and it’s always felt reliable and developer-friendly. While there isn’t a huge difference between GitLab and GitHub feature-wise, GitLab really shines when working within a closed group or an organization. The built-in CI/CD, project management tools, and permission handling make it an excellent choice for team-based workflows. That said, one challenge I’ve faced—especially from a startup perspective—is that some essential features are limited in the free version. For instance, group member limits and restrictions around branch protection rules can become a bottleneck when you're trying to scale a small team with good practices. It would definitely help if GitLab offered a bit more flexibility in its free tier for early-stage teams. Still, despite these limitations, GitLab remains a strong, all-in-one DevOps platform that I’ve enjoyed working with. ----- Seite: 1 / 50\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/28004/gitlab) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten