--- description: Reviews zu BrowserStack Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche BrowserStack mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: BrowserStack | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Bugtracker](/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/200650/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack Seite: 1 / 32\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack ist eine browserübergreifende und Anwendungstestsoftware, die Unternehmen in verschiedenen Branchen dabei unterstützt, automatisierte Tests in der Cloud zu erleichtern. Zu den wichtigsten Funktionen gehören das Zyklieren von API-Schlüsseln, die Überprüfung von Sicherheitsfragebögen, die Bereitstellung und Aufhebung der Bereitstellung von Nutzern, IP-Whitelisting und Geolocation-Tests. Teams, die BrowserStack verwenden, können IPs für eingehenden und ausgehenden Datenverkehr von Remote-Geräten auf die Whitelist setzen und sicher über IP-Zugriffsbeschränkungen testen. Admins können Dashboard-Ansichten anpassen, Unterteams erstellen und Teams parallele Threads gemäß ihren Testanforderungen zuweisen. Darüber hinaus können Entwicklungsfachkräfte die Leistung von Automatisierungstests und Filteranalysen nach Builds, Teams, Raten, Fehlern, Browser- und Geräteabdeckung und mehr bewerten. BrowserStack bietet SAML-basierte (Security Assertion Markup Language) SSO (Single Sign-On)-Funktionen und erweiterte lokale Tests mit Transparenz und Kontrolle über offene Tunnel, Unterstützung für PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System)-basiertes Proxying und Admin-Kontrolle über lokale Einstellungen. Das Produkt ist im Rahmen eines Monats-/Jahresabonnement verfügbar und der Support erfolgt über Online-Anfrageformulare. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 774 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 774 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: BrowserStack - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 39,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Australien, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Deutschland, Dänemark, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - A/B Testing - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Aktivitätsüberwachung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - Anforderungsbasiertes Testen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anmerkungen - Anomalieerkennung - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Kategorien - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Automated Testing ## Integrationen (16 insgesamt) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... und 1 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Bugtracker](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Bugtracker](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4721/bug-tracking/software) - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4187/automation-testing/software) - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4622/test-management-tools/software) - [Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4316/performance-testing/software) - [Observability-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4534/observability/software) ## Alternativen 1. [TestRail](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/76542/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 2. [Userlytics](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/88642/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 3. [Hotjar](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/136486/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (543 reviews) 4. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/201829/testim) — 4.6/5 (50 reviews) 5. [Screeb](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/335937/screeb) — 4.5/5 (42 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Reliable Cross-Platform Testing with Some Cost Considerations" — 4.0/5 > **Azmal** | *2. April 2026* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is its instant access to a wide range of real devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. The ability to perform live, manual testing on both iOS and Android devices directly from the browser is extremely convenient and saves a lot of setup time. I also found the platform very useful for: Quick debugging with real-time interaction Consistent performance across devices and OS versions Ease of use — no complex installation or configuration required Reliable cloud infrastructure, which makes testing smooth even for remote teams Overall, it significantly improves testing efficiency and helps identify real-world issues that emulators often miss. > > **Nachteile**: The main drawback is the cost, especially for small teams or when you need extended access to real devices for manual testing. I also faced a few practical limitations: Session time limits and concurrency restrictions can slow down testing when multiple testers are involved Occasional lag or latency, particularly when network conditions aren’t ideal Limited free access, making it harder to evaluate thoroughly before committing Device availability issues at peak times (some popular devices are not always instantly accessible) > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It provides a reliable and efficient platform for testing applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need to maintain physical infrastructure. The ability to perform live, manual testing on real iOS and Android devices is a major advantage, helping to identify real-world issues that are often missed in emulators. The platform is easy to use, quick to set up, and integrates well into existing testing workflows. However, there are some limitations, such as pricing, session limits, and occasional latency, which can impact productivity during heavy usage. Overall, it is a powerful and practical solution for cross-platform testing, especially for teams that need quick access to multiple devices, but it may require careful cost management depending on usage. ----- ### "Cost-to-Functionality Winner: BrowserStack is a Solid, Feature Rich, Testing Platfrom" — 5.0/5 > **David** | *2. April 2026* | Marketing & Werbung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: BrowserStack's major strength is that they do exactly what they advertise. Their testing platform allows us to quickly test new functionality while at the same time, perform accurate and automated regression testing. Personally, my favorite feature is the visual compare feature where you can test your software with literally hundreds of platform and browser combinations and easily tell where your UI may have to be tweaked to provide a solid experience for your end-users. We evaluated many platforms prior to choosing BrowserStack and while some (not many) offered similar feature sets, the price of BrowserStack made it an absolute no-brainer. The value you get for your money is heads and tails above other similar systems. While there is a small learning curve, the software is generally very easy to use without the need to reach out to customer support for anything. > > **Nachteile**: Occasionally the speed of BrowserStack can be annoying. It's not anything that reaches the level of unusable or support worthy, it's just something that comes with using web-based SaaS. > > Overall, you can't beat the value-to-functionality of BrowserStack. It's a solid testing platform that is constantly adding new functionality and hardening existing features. I have no interest in shopping around for anything else in the testing arena because BrowserStack covers all the bases\! ----- ### "Easier to use simulators/emulators" — 1.0/5 > **Zach** | *23. März 2026* | Konsumgüter | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It had a decent availability of Android and iOS mobile devices and OS versions, including new OS versions. That's about it. > > **Nachteile**: Issue resolution, support, lots of downtime and issues that would cause test failures - all resulting in really poor usage as an automated testing device provider > > It was a large part of my job just tracking failures on browserstack devices, hounding their support to fix things, and triaging flaky test failures that stemmed from excessively variable device states. It is not worth it to use this provider for automated testing for this reason alone. Use simulators and emulators. They are sufficient for catching 99.99% of issues. ----- ### "Great Free Version With a lot More Option When Using Full Version" — 5.0/5 > **LEONARDO** | *3. April 2026* | Telekommunikation | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Disclaimer: My team and I have only used the Test Management tool from Browserstack, so I am reviewing only this part. The thing I like the most is the limited free version of the software. Why? because it is really important to be able to check all the features the limited edition has to offer, so the team can evaluate the software and decide if this is the way to go or not. I really appreciate the functionalities that the limited version offers, as we (as a team) are slowly getting to a point where we would probably need more. And we can go to our management and sat "hey, look, we have used this, but now we would need more. We have 100 test scenarios, but the development could be much faster". > > **Nachteile**: When we started using the free version of the tool, we quickly realized that this will probably not be enough. We really miss the AI integration, at least limited one, with the free version, because this would speed up our process tremendously. It is not a "deal breaker", but it would be nice to have. > > I would say that it was 9/10. I am deducting one point because of the lack of AI in the free version (at least a limited version). Otherwise the tool is absolutely super. user management is great, test case creation is nice, also the management of already created cases is easy. We are a team of 4 people and everybody got used to it immediately and now we are using it on a daily basis. And don't forget the integaration with other Browserstack solutions. I have only reviewed the Test Management part, as this is the only one that we are currently using. i have used the test recording fetaure and it was a blast, so it is only a matter of time when we will use more Browserstack's features. ----- ### "Simplifying Testing with Real Devices and Seamless Automation" — 4.0/5 > **Abin** | *24. März 2026* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: What I like most about BrowserStack is how easily it brings everything together in one place. I can quickly access a wide range of real devices and browsers for live testing, which makes debugging much faster and more reliable without needing to manage physical devices(using Live and App Live), while also avoiding the overhead of maintaining an in-house device lab. At the same time, the platform fits well into our automation workflow with Automate and App Automate, allowing us to run tests in parallel and integrate with CI/CD without much effort. It also helps keep things organized with its test management capabilities, so tracking and maintaining test cases becomes easier. Overall, it has made the entire testing process smoother and more efficient, and whenever I’ve needed help, the support team has been responsive and useful. > > **Nachteile**: One area where BrowserStack could improve is performance consistency at times, especially when using certain devices where sessions can feel slightly slow or laggy depending on network conditions. Also, while the platform offers a lot of features, it can take some time to fully explore and get comfortable with everything, especially for new users. Occasionally, debugging automation failures can require extra effort due to limited visibility compared to local environments. That said, these are relatively minor compared to the overall benefits the platform provides. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It makes both manual and automated testing easier by providing quick access to real devices and browsers, without the need for managing infrastructure. It fits well into daily workflows, from quick debugging to running automated tests, and has helped improve testing speed and efficiency. While there are occasional minor performance lags, it remains a reliable and valuable tool for the QA process. ----- Seite: 1 / 32\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten