--- description: Reviews zu BrowserStack Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche BrowserStack mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: BrowserStack | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Generative KI-Tools](/directory/4616/generative-ai/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/200650/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack Seite: 1 / 32\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) > BrowserStack ist eine browserübergreifende und Anwendungstestsoftware, die Unternehmen in verschiedenen Branchen dabei unterstützt, automatisierte Tests in der Cloud zu erleichtern. Zu den wichtigsten Funktionen gehören das Zyklieren von API-Schlüsseln, die Überprüfung von Sicherheitsfragebögen, die Bereitstellung und Aufhebung der Bereitstellung von Nutzern, IP-Whitelisting und Geolocation-Tests. Teams, die BrowserStack verwenden, können IPs für eingehenden und ausgehenden Datenverkehr von Remote-Geräten auf die Whitelist setzen und sicher über IP-Zugriffsbeschränkungen testen. Admins können Dashboard-Ansichten anpassen, Unterteams erstellen und Teams parallele Threads gemäß ihren Testanforderungen zuweisen. Darüber hinaus können Entwicklungsfachkräfte die Leistung von Automatisierungstests und Filteranalysen nach Builds, Teams, Raten, Fehlern, Browser- und Geräteabdeckung und mehr bewerten. BrowserStack bietet SAML-basierte (Security Assertion Markup Language) SSO (Single Sign-On)-Funktionen und erweiterte lokale Tests mit Transparenz und Kontrolle über offene Tunnel, Unterstützung für PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication System)-basiertes Proxying und Admin-Kontrolle über lokale Einstellungen. Das Produkt ist im Rahmen eines Monats-/Jahresabonnement verfügbar und der Support erfolgt über Online-Anfrageformulare. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 776 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 776 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.2/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: BrowserStack - **Gegründet**: 2011 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 39,00 $ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Amerikanische Jungferninseln, Australien, Brasilien, Britische Jungferninseln, Deutschland, Dänemark, Indien, Irland, Israel, Kanada, Mexiko, Singapur, Südafrika, Vereinigte Arabische Emirate, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - A/B Testing - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Aktivitätsüberwachung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - Anforderungsbasiertes Testen - Anforderungsmanagement - Anmerkungen - Anomalieerkennung - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Fragen - Anpassbare Kategorien - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Audit Trail - Aufgabenmanagement - Automated Testing ## Integrationen (73 insgesamt) - APS Payroll - AWS Cloud9 - AWS Lambda - Android Studio - Appium - Asana - Atlas - Azure DevOps Labs - Azure DevOps Server - Azure DevTest Labs - Azure Pipelines - Azure SQL Database - Birdeye - Birdseye - BitBrowser ... und 58 weitere Integrationen ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Generative KI-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4616/generative-ai/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Generative KI-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4616/generative-ai/software) - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4187/automation-testing/software) - [Testmanagement-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4622/test-management-tools/software) - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4634/load-testing/software) - [User Testing Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4651/user-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [TestRail](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/76542/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 2. [Userlytics](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/88642/userlytics) — 4.7/5 (55 reviews) 3. [Hotjar](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/136486/hotjar) — 4.6/5 (545 reviews) 4. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/201829/testim) — 4.6/5 (50 reviews) 5. [XM for Strategy & Research](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/175273/strategy-and-research) — 4.7/5 (427 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Reliable Cross-Platform Testing with Some Cost Considerations" — 4.0/5 > **Azmal** | *2. April 2026* | Bildungsmanagement | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The biggest advantage of BrowserStack is its instant access to a wide range of real devices without needing to maintain physical hardware. The ability to perform live, manual testing on both iOS and Android devices directly from the browser is extremely convenient and saves a lot of setup time. I also found the platform very useful for: Quick debugging with real-time interaction Consistent performance across devices and OS versions Ease of use — no complex installation or configuration required Reliable cloud infrastructure, which makes testing smooth even for remote teams Overall, it significantly improves testing efficiency and helps identify real-world issues that emulators often miss. > > **Nachteile**: The main drawback is the cost, especially for small teams or when you need extended access to real devices for manual testing. I also faced a few practical limitations: Session time limits and concurrency restrictions can slow down testing when multiple testers are involved Occasional lag or latency, particularly when network conditions aren’t ideal Limited free access, making it harder to evaluate thoroughly before committing Device availability issues at peak times (some popular devices are not always instantly accessible) > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been very positive. It provides a reliable and efficient platform for testing applications across a wide range of real devices and browsers without the need to maintain physical infrastructure. The ability to perform live, manual testing on real iOS and Android devices is a major advantage, helping to identify real-world issues that are often missed in emulators. The platform is easy to use, quick to set up, and integrates well into existing testing workflows. However, there are some limitations, such as pricing, session limits, and occasional latency, which can impact productivity during heavy usage. Overall, it is a powerful and practical solution for cross-platform testing, especially for teams that need quick access to multiple devices, but it may require careful cost management depending on usage. ----- ### "Gold standard solution for testing" — 4.0/5 > **Prabhakar** | *31. März 2026* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Seamless integration and Testing with modern test frameworks. Numerous devices availability for testing in multiple environment and platforms. Advanced and reliable Debugging tools for usage > > **Nachteile**: Speed of execution is slower than manual trigger. Latency issues on peak hours. Pricing is little complicated for parallel licence usage > > First choice for Automation testing for different platforms. Mostly used for quick setup of the tests with multiple frameworks. Multiple integration options. Good customer support. ----- ### "Easier to use simulators/emulators" — 1.0/5 > **Zach** | *23. März 2026* | Konsumgüter | Empfehlungsbewertung: 0.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It had a decent availability of Android and iOS mobile devices and OS versions, including new OS versions. That's about it. > > **Nachteile**: Issue resolution, support, lots of downtime and issues that would cause test failures - all resulting in really poor usage as an automated testing device provider > > It was a large part of my job just tracking failures on browserstack devices, hounding their support to fix things, and triaging flaky test failures that stemmed from excessively variable device states. It is not worth it to use this provider for automated testing for this reason alone. Use simulators and emulators. They are sufficient for catching 99.99% of issues. ----- ### "Reliable and Efficient Testing Platform with Minor Drawbacks" — 5.0/5 > **Arfa** | *26. März 2026* | Bekleidung & Mode | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: its extensive real device and browser coverage, which makes cross-browser testing seamless and reliable. The ease of use and quick setup allow teams to start testing without heavy configuration. It significantly speeds up testing cycles and helps identify issues early, improving overall product quality > > **Nachteile**: its pricing, which can be quite high for smaller teams. Additionally, automation setup and debugging can be a bit complex, and session timeouts or flaky connections sometimes impact the overall testing experience. > > My overall experience with BrowserStack has been positive. It provides a reliable platform for cross-browser and real device testing, making it easier to identify and fix issues across different environments. The interface is user-friendly, and it helps speed up testing cycles significantly. While there are occasional performance lags and the pricing can be a concern, the overall value it delivers in terms of efficiency and test coverage makes it a strong tool for QA teams ----- ### "User-Friendly Platform, Yet Customer Support Needs Improvement" — 4.0/5 > **Arthi** | *24. März 2026* | Buchhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The UI of BrowserStack is clean, intuitive, and easy to navigate. Most of the frequently used features—like device selection, browser choices, and test session controls—are clearly visible and well‑organized. The overall usability is smooth, and switching back and forth between devices or test sessions feels seamless. The platform offers straightforward access to essential tools such as logs, screenshots, and videos, making debugging much faster. Overall, the interface supports a very user‑friendly testing experience with minimal learning curve. > > **Nachteile**: The response I received from \[sensitive content hidden\] came across as quite rude. It gave me the impression that BrowserStack may not be fully prepared to assist customers who have doubts or questions. If new customers are addressed in this manner, it raises concerns about the level of support provided to existing customers as well. > > Overall, my experience has been positive so far. I’m still getting familiar with the application, but the learning curve has been manageable. It would be beneficial to have more integrations with other tools and platforms, as this would further enhance usability and workflow efficiency. ----- Seite: 1 / 32\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten