--- description: Reviews zu mabl Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche mabl mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: mabl | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [DevOps Tools](/directory/4380/devops/software) > [mabl](/software/191857/mabl) # mabl Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/191857/mabl Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/191857/mabl?page=2) > mabl ist eine intelligente Testautomatisierungsplattform für agile Teams. Die Anwendung ist eine SaaS-Lösung, die automatisierte End-to-End-Tests in den gesamten Entwicklungslebenszyklus integriert. Mit mabl ist es einfach, zuverlässige Tests zu erstellen, auszuführen und zu warten. Mit mabl können Softwareteams die Testabdeckung erhöhen, die Entwicklung beschleunigen und die Anwendungsqualität verbessern. So kann die Qualität der Anwendungen in jeder Phase sichergestellt werden. Die native Auto-Heal-Funktion von mabl passt die Tests an die Entwicklung der Anwendungs-UI an, und die umfassenden Testergebnisse helfen Nutzern, Fehler schnell und leicht zu beheben, bevor sie sich auf die Produktion auswirken. Die Anwendung bietet eine 14-tägige kostenlosen Testversion an. > > Bewertung: **4.0/5** von 67 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.0/5** | 67 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 3.9/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 70% | (7/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: mabl - **Gegründet**: 2017 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Argentinien, Australien, Brasilien, Deutschland, Finnland, Frankreich, Indien, Irland, Israel, Italien, Japan, Kanada, Luxemburg, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Niederlande, Norwegen, Philippinen, Polen, Portugal und 7 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Anforderungsbasiertes Testen - Anpassbare Berichte - Benutzer-Management - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Daten-Import / -Export - Datenextraktion - Datenvisualisierung - Drag-and-Drop - Einmalige Anmeldung - Fehlerbehebungsberichte - Fehlerverfolgung - Genehmigungs-Workflow - Konfigurationsmanagement - Konfigurierbarer Workflow - Leistungskennzahlen - Management von Softwaretests ## Integrationen (9 insgesamt) - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Jenkins - Jira - Postman - Segment - Slack ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [DevOps Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4380/devops/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [DevOps Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4380/devops/software) - [Automated Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4187/automation-testing/software) - [Lasttest-Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4634/load-testing/software) - [Testing Tools](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4316/performance-testing/software) ## Alternativen 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/200650/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (752 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/228334/accelq) — 4.9/5 (130 reviews) 3. [Tricentis Testim](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/201829/testim) — 4.6/5 (50 reviews) 4. [Tricentis Tosca](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/295561/tricentis-tosca) — 4.2/5 (18 reviews) 5. [CircleCI](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/128455/circleci) — 4.6/5 (92 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "The future of automated front end testing" — 5.0/5 > **Dono** | *20. Mai 2019* | Bankwesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: So easy to use. Simple record and playback Has the option to go into more advanced assertions Great cross browser support Extremely stable tests The AI approach to adaptive assertions on tests > > **Nachteile**: Still quite new so some features are not there yet. Otherwise they are faultless for me > > Absolutely amazing tool and I personally believe it is the future of automated GUI testing. This tool will save software engineering teams many hours that has previously been spent on maintaining and debugging failing GUI tests. ----- ### "Simple, yet powerful" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *2. August 2019* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Mabl has become the go-to for our e2e testing needs. Creation and maintenance of tests has become a breeze. Test failure investigation is quicker than before with detailed screenshots and HAR captures. > > **Nachteile**: Mabl is not always able to handle tricker elements in our UI, which requires us to write custom JS steps or reach to to their support. Also, run-time of our tests is slower than our previous selenium-based tests. > > Previously, with our selenium-based framework tests would take too long to write and maintain, which made it impossible to develop new e2e tests within sprints for the new features we were developing. With Mabl, we can quickly write tests so that we have UI automation coverage within the same sprint for new features. ----- ### "The product has more bugs than its worth, and it takes longer to perform its tests than one of my te" — 2.0/5 > **Matthew** | *4. Mai 2018* | Informationstechnologie & -dienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 2.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is easy to set up use, and get running. Apparently I have to be more wordy in this field, why I dont know. > > **Nachteile**: The problem is that the tool will log its self out and then pass the remaining tests. The chrome pug-in requires a login but then forces the user to log in again to the website in the same browser, after clicking the button in the plug-in. creating tests that would manipulate the data seem easy, with applying some simple coding skills the user is able to create valuable tests. the problem is that mabl cant find the field, button, or part of the page that was selected in the test creation and simply stop running, no error, nothing. Dont get me wrong I think that this tool is going to be amazing, the problem is that it is simply not there yet. > > I want to be clear, I think that this product is on the right track, and is going to be amazing. this tool will free up the testers from the less effective validation of the product by doing that kind of testing, thus freeing up the tester to actually test and see where things break. Ai is the automation direction that we need to go, and mabl will free up money and people to do the jobs that we are needed to do. ----- ### "Useful test automation tool for monitoring website performance and checking broken links" — 4.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *3. Mai 2018* | Computer-Software | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Mabl provides a very straightforward user interface to set up an automated test which can perform smoke tests like checking all of the links on a page and report back all of the broken links. The learning curve is very small, so you can set up a new test in production in less than 10 minutes having never used the app before. It will send out a report by e-mail at your preferred interval with the test execution status, time, run time, pages checked, links checked and broken links. > > **Nachteile**: It is quite bare bones as it is, if you already have complex API tests in Postman, Selenium IDE and Java/C\# tests Jenkins, then Using Mabl in addition to these would really be nothing more than a novelty. Because your current unit tests and CI smoke tests probably provide ample code coverage. I would imagine the value from the mabl tests are aimed at a novice user with zero development background who needs basic website monitoring. Because you could probably get this data and more details on page exceptions from a tool like Datadog, Bugsnag or Kibana or Kubernetes. I would imagine that future iterations of the product will probably be more feature rich in these areas. > > Learned about a new and easy to use web monitoring tool which provides easy access to UI tests with with little setup time, but provides long term reporting on issues with an app. ----- ### "Mabl is a very innovative idea and it makes testing not stink" — 5.0/5 > **Verifizierter Rezensent** | *3. Mai 2018* | Computer-Software > > **Vorteile**: Personally, I hate writing test automation and this makes it way easier. Tests no longer become brittle over time and Mabl adapts to changing UIs. It's also super easy to implement into your CI/CD pipeline. > > **Nachteile**: Initially I struggled with getting it to test web apps behind corporate firewalls but this was fixed when I could whitelist the Mabl IP addresses. The UI takes a bit of getting used to as well in terms of navigation. ----- Seite: 1 / 4\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/191857/mabl?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/191857/mabl) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten