
OpenShift
Über OpenShift










OpenShift Preis
OpenShift bietet eine Gratisversion und eine kostenlose Testversion. Die kostenpflichtige Version von OpenShift ist ab 20,00 $/Monat verfügbar.
Alternativen für OpenShift
Alle Bewertungen zu OpenShift Filter anwenden
Nutzerbewertungen zu OpenShift durchsuchen
Alle Bewertungen zu OpenShift Filter anwenden

- Branche: Informationsdienst
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Openshift: Best tool and software to manage the containers.
We are very happy with the Openshift and features that they offer to the container application deployment and security.
Vorteile
It's very easy to manage the container applications and issues related to them like container image scanning and the securities related to them before the production deployment.
Nachteile
Not much resource is available in the market who are expert in the container application security in market.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
good tool for deploy your application.
it's a great tool for deploying your application and creating many resources like LB, config map, secrets etc. You can easily learn full Kubernetes by working with this tool.
Vorteile
you don't need to work in CLI, it has a great GUI and it provides high security for your resources.
Nachteile
It's too expensive for the normal company or person you want learn.
- Branche: Bibliotheken
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Openshift - had to leave for Linode due to the forced and abrupt move from Openshift v2 to v3
It was an excellent product, Red Hat's management and treatment of users is the problem.
Vorteile
Openshift v2 was an excellent product that I couldn't fault at all, in fact I really really liked it. The problem came when Red Hat wanted everyone to move from v2 to v3 and gave very short notice and a very short timeline. Version 3 was completely different, based on containers.
Nachteile
As stated above, the real problem with Openshift is the way Red Hat forced everyone to move from v2 to v3 in a ridiculously short time. Documentation for migration was useless, I tried to migrate using it - it all failed. I could not trust Red Hat again after that experience, so I moved to Linode and have never looked back.
- Branche: Bankwesen
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Container Orchestration Made Easy
Vorteile
- Openshift UI to easily deploy, scale and destroy pods.
- Has Kubernetes features
- Support for public and private cloud deployments
Nachteile
Sometimes deployments/pods get stuck and are not deleted even after multiple retries.

- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Ready to use PaaS service!
Vorteile
Really like the easy to deploy and use the PaaS services on IBM Cloud. The self-management make it easier for developers. I really like the good integration with IBM Cloud Paks.
Nachteile
A problem is that you can shut down the services, so you are not charge. If you have a disaster recovery scenario with Openshift on IBM Cloud, you can't stop the compute charging.

- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Starting a new era in software architecture
Vorteile
Easy to use, full of useful feature. It make easy and valuable migration to innovative achitecture based on containerized approach. You can use a community edition (Openshift Origin) or chose the RED HAT edition. Based on Kubernetes. Fully integrated with many other useful tool for monitoring and manager the full software cycle, until the deploy.
Nachteile
Documentation is still poor. Not so fast in receive support from community. Security aspect need to be better debeate.

- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Best Environment for deploying applications
Easy to deploy and manage the applications in Redhat Openshift container
Vorteile
I am using Redhat Openshift container since 1 1/2 years and i really loved since deploying and monitoring the application is very easy when compare to deploying the application in traditional app servers like Tomcat
Nachteile
Pricing for enterprise is bit costly when compare with Amazon web services (AWS).Also engaging Redhat support team to troubleshoot the issue is very difficult

- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 11–50 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
OpenShift Is A Good PaaS Platform
Vorteile
One of the best PaaS platforms that I've used. I've sent an Java application there and I had a best experience. It works with Java, Ruby and more. Eclipse extension works very well with OpenShift. But the free plan have some limitations. And the OpenShift is very good if you're learning about Java containers and how it works.
Nachteile
Free plan is not too good and it has some limitations.

- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great business solution for cloud deployments
Happy to use such an abstractive layer on top of Kubernetes and use cloud deployment strategies with less hassle.
Vorteile
It is great to have Kubernetes functionality with a professional support and frequent updates. Multitenancy at best.
Nachteile
It sometimes can be very difficult to debug and manage. Deployment changes can be tricky that you spent hours to resolve.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
-
Quelle der Bewertung
OpenShift - Best platform for developers
I have been using OpenShift for more than 2 years now. I have seen lot of improvements in Openshift and it's getting better and better.
The most important thing is that it provides a lifetime free account which can be used as a hands on over OpenShift.
Most important, you can attach your own domain to your application, even on free account.
Openshift works using gears and cartridges. It has now lots of cartridges available and you can also create new custom cartridge.
Vorteile
1. Free lifetime account with 3 small gears.
2. You can add multiple cartridges in a single gear.
3. attach your own domain to your application, even on free account.
4. Support deploy on git push
Nachteile
1. You can sudo login to your gear, but you can always contact customer care they will handle such situation.
- Branche: Finanzdienstleistungen
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Perfect Container Orchestrator
It solved our use case of transitioning from monolith to microservices.
Vorteile
If you have microservices use case and have following questions like
How to scale my services?
How to monitor my services?
How manage deployment?
How to make services resilient to failures?
Answer to all the above questions is Openshift. As it eases the pain of development and there is solution available to a known services deployment issue already. Integration of our existing services was smoothly done.
Nachteile
We didn't face any major issue while implementing or changing our deployment strategy for microservices. However as a developer I think there are many parts that one needs to understand to get going. But I don't think that as an issue. All tools have some learning curve and Openshift is no different.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Application Development is fairly easy although you will need to read documentation
Vorteile
It's fairly easy to use when it's well set up by the administrators. Documentation is very complete. Creation and management of volumes and persistent volumes. Pod log is fairly useful for debugging.
Nachteile
Secrets management need more user-friendly editing. Large amount of pipelines in the same project makes it hardly manageable. Pod log randomly skips entries.
- Branche: Bankwesen
- Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Openshift - move from legacy to cloud and kubernetis
Vorteile
ease of Deployment
ease for monitoring the logs
build management
Config validation
Nachteile
Monitoring is poor
logs are not accesible directly for real time , only first n number of lines are visible
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
openshift through the eyes of a machine learning engineer
In general, I have not used kubernetes through the user interface and it can be said that it provides a lot of ease of use. But the bugs that I had experienced from time to time were quite annoying and it was quite bad that there was no solution.
Vorteile
I've used gcp, eks and aks before. When I compared them by looking at them, it was very useful that I could load and edit yamls on a user interface of its own.
Nachteile
Since it uses old versions of kubernetes, you may encounter interesting bugs.
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Boost my development speed
Vorteile
Container orchestration platforms overall increased my development speed and agility. However Openshift can be considered as premium class of the sector of orchestration platform providers. Its unique developer experience and ease of use differentiates itself from other platforms.
Nachteile
Actually I liked it all about the software
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 5.001–10.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Easy to use, recommended
Vorteile
It is a system that is easy to use, capable of changing capacity in case of need, or even automatically.
Nachteile
We are having problems with GPU sharing.

- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
OpenShif opened Kubernetes to the masses
Openshift made it possible for us to setup a complete docker orchestration solution in an effortless way, including an amazing CI/CD pipeline which basically automates everything.
Vorteile
* Very simple to setup and configure
* Friendly user interface
* Great dashboards
* Broad set of integrations
* Large collection of guides and tutorials
Nachteile
* Monitoring could be improved
* Troubleshooting can be tricky, as it's not always easy to find out exactly what's going wrong

- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 501–1.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
It's fancy
OpenShift is great - the UI is awesome it works like a charm.
Vorteile
It's fancy, it's modern, it supports many languages it has automatic scaling, compatible with Kubernetes and easily migrates to other OS
Nachteile
Nothing really, I am curious why people prefer Kubernetes rather than Openshift. I found Openshift easier to work with.
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great for horizontal scaling
Vorteile
Ease of deployment and management of Kubernetes cluster. Very comfortable service and route management.
Nachteile
Not having a gpu scheduling option for machine learning models.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Openshift_01
Vorteile
it is a good management platform run on kubernetes for containerized applications.
Nachteile
You must learn it from a expert devOps engineer or else it too hard learn.
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Täglich für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Openshift review
Vorteile
easy to use, clear, well organized menus, scalable
Nachteile
I am not sure what is missing. I didnt encountered any problem
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 2–10 Mitarbeiter
-
Quelle der Bewertung
- Branche: Computer- & Netzwerksicherheit
- Unternehmensgröße: 51–200 Mitarbeiter
- Monatlich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Openshift for deployment
Vorteile
We use openshift to deploy all our spring boot projects. It is very easy to use and we can directly check the logs there if any issue occurs. Or you can easily down and up a service with a single click of a button.
Nachteile
There is no con to using openshift. It works fine for us.
- Branche: Telekommunikation
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Weitere für 6-12 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great to automate the provisioning and the management for your containers
Vorteile
it's very effective when be used with openstack for managing our infrastructure, and it provides great services like monitoring containers, and databases
Nachteile
It's not easy to deal with, and for some issues the vendor takes long time to get it resolved, so it will be great if the user interface enhanced with more help options.
- Branche: Computer-Software
- Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
- Monatlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Great Managed solution for container management
For a company that wants to modernize its legacy software, this is one of the best options.
Vorteile
It provides a complete suite for software containerization. At the same time, it is based on open-source Kubernetes.
Nachteile
I did not find it easy to integrate other third-party tools in the open shift. It is good as long as you stay in the toolset.
- Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
- Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
- Weitere für 1-5 Monate genutzt
-
Quelle der Bewertung
Java EE engine on cloud
I used OpenShift to test how easy could be to move a Java EE application to the cloud
Vorteile
I had to do little changes to code, just for data persistence to db, globally the migration was very easy
Nachteile
A little con was the need to learn about rhc tool