--- description: Reviews zu Lucernex Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche Lucernex mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Lucernex | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Buchhaltungssoftware für Immobilien](/directory/311/real-estate-accounting-software/software) > [Lucernex](/software/141184/lucernex) # Lucernex Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/141184/lucernex Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/141184/lucernex?page=2) > Lucernex von Accruent ist eine umfassende Lösung für die Verwaltung des gesamten Immobilienlebenszyklus. Die Lösung hilft Teams, FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) ASC (Accredited Standards Committee) 842, IASB (International Accounting Standards Board) IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standard) 16 und GASB (Governmental Accounting Standards Board) 87 einzuhalten, vereinfacht das Bauprojektmanagement, rationalisiert die Leasingverwaltung und -buchhaltung und ermöglicht es Unternehmen, ihre Immobilienportfolios zu optimieren. Die Lösung unterstützt globale Portfolios mit mehreren Währungen und Sprachen und lässt sich in bekannte ERP-Systeme (Enterprise Resource Planning) integrieren. Lucernex lässt sich konfigurieren, um einzigartige Kundenanforderungen zu erfüllen, und hält die höchsten Sicherheitsstandards mit SOC1 -und SOC2-Zertifizierungen (Standard Occupational Classification) ein. > > Bewertung: **4.3/5** von 37 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.3/5** | 37 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.1/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.0/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 80% | (8/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Accruent - **Gegründet**: 1999 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Linux (Desktop), Windows (On-Premise), Linux (On-Premise), Chromebook (Desktop) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch, Italienisch, Japanisch, Niederländisch, Portugiesisch, Schwedisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Afghanistan, Argentinien, Armenien, Aserbaidschan, Bahrain, Bangladesch, Bhutan, Bolivien, Brasilien, Brunei Darussalam, Chile, China, Dänemark, Ecuador, Falklandinseln, Finnland, Französisch-Guayana, Georgien, Guyana, Indien und 52 weitere ## Funktionen - API - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Ad-hoc-Berichterstattung - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Analytics - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Arbeitsauftragsverwaltung - Asset Lifecycle Management - Aufgabenmanagement - Belegungsmanagement - Berichterstattung / Analyse - Berichterstattung und Statistik - Buchhaltung - Budget Tracking - Budgetierung/Prognosen - Compliance Management - Dashboard-Erstellung ## Integrationen (2 insgesamt) - Accruent - ServiceChannel ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Buchhaltungssoftware für Immobilien](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/311/real-estate-accounting-software/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Buchhaltungssoftware für Immobilien](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/311/real-estate-accounting-software/software) - [Rechnungsprogramme für Handwerker & Bau](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/21/accounting-job-costing-software/software) - [Buchhaltungssoftware für Immobilienverwaltung](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/125/accounting-software/software) - [Wohnungsverwaltungssoftware](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/131/apartment-management-software/software) - [Hausverwaltungssoftware](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/150/rental-property-management-software/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Sage Intacct](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1710/sage-intacct) — 4.3/5 (677 reviews) 2. [Buildium](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1154/buildium-property-manager) — 4.5/5 (2207 reviews) 3. [Yardi Voyager](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/2727/yardi-voyager) — 4.2/5 (252 reviews) 4. [AppFolio Property Manager](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1207/appfolio-property-manager) — 4.5/5 (1888 reviews) 5. [Avail](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/70317/avail) — 4.6/5 (276 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Great implementation experience" — 5.0/5 > **Anna** | *4. März 2026* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I like the speed of the system and support that we received during implementation. We were able to implement the system on a significant time crunch, so we received great support from \[sensitive content hidden\] and the rest of their team behind the scenes. The system is pretty intuitive to use for everyday tasks and training the team wasn't difficult. > > **Nachteile**: Transitioning from Tririga was bit more challenging than expected since in Tririga vendors are tied to the store rather than each individual payment/recurring expense. I would like to see the vendor tied in at the store level rather than at the payment level. > > So far it's been a pretty positive experience. We are still finishing up some additional advanced reports, but the system is intuitive and has handled a lot of what we were looking for. ----- ### "Data heavy but complex for new users" — 4.0/5 > **Aaron** | *4. März 2026* | Essen & Trinken | Empfehlungsbewertung: 6.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is able to cover a variety lease types and situations. While many portfolio management software's fit one type of situation or another, Lucernex can adapt. > > **Nachteile**: It is not user friendly and feels very cluttered. It takes a new user a lot of time to learn the system, so it is difficult to get other teams to adopt the use for data look up. > > I've been a user for a long time. Some companies implement well and others do not. There should be a greater involvement from Accruent to assure that companies are getting the best use possible from their products. Accruent needs to better understand the users and uses and should not charge customers to test a new product that is not yet a proven benefit. ----- ### "Skimming the surface" — 3.0/5 > **Jennette** | *2. März 2026* | Immobilien | Empfehlungsbewertung: 5.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is somewhat easy to navigate through. The Lucernex user groups have been the most helpful and the communication in the monthly meetings I find helpful. > > **Nachteile**: The look is dated. The uploaders are difficult to use, the help notes are vague, the reporting filters and customizations are difficult. The new updates are communicated, but unclear if the user company has access to them. > > It's been okay. We use it for accounting purposes, but I would love to see it used more robustly in our company. ----- ### "Data at your fingertips if you dont mind what it looks like" — 4.0/5 > **Paul** | *2. März 2026* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Depth/granularity of data manipulation is really powerful and the ability to further customize MOST data with Javascript is game-changing. However some data is not accessible in JS and that would really enhance our process if that were to expand. > > **Nachteile**: User interface is less than desirable. Lacks some QoL seen in modern web experiences. Search is not retained which is annoying when digging through the hundreds of reports. If you click into a report and its not what you wanted, you have to enter your search term again. I wish that Invalid workflows/tasks could auto-fix themselves if for example, the project membership requirement is rectified. > > As a System Admin I find that errors/bugs/defects are not solved in a timely manner. Generally ugly but I'm speaking more for our users on that. Document management is not great. I don't know how to expand on that without really digging into our process but in short, I kinda wish we had never added Documents into workflows because once a document is added within a workflow, you can never get rid of it. Lucernex needs a Document Retention Management interface. ----- ### "Lucernex Overall" — 4.0/5 > **Jay** | *2. März 2026* | Einzelhandel | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It is a great product in theory. There is so much potential from a database and project management perspective that it could be a super powerful tool. > > **Nachteile**: The final execution of the product does leave a lot on the table. Small gaps in the system make it a less powerful tool. Getting changes implemented with Engineering is an awful experience. Once something is taken on by them it is just sitting in a black hole. > > Overall experience is very positive and most of the people we collaborate with are very helpful and eager to make Lucernex a better product. ----- Seite: 1 / 3\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/141184/lucernex?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/141184/lucernex) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten