ALM/Quality Center

4,4
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

4,4
Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen

Über ALM/Quality Center

Micro Focus ALM/Quality Center ist eine Lifecycle-Management-Lösung, die Unternehmen beim Anforderungsmanagement, bei der Prüfung und der Entwicklung in einer agilen Umgebung unterstützt. Die Lösung ist für Teams jeder Größe geeignet. Zu den wichtigsten Funktionen von ALM/Quality Center gehören Projektplanung und -verfolgung, Application Lifecycle Intelligence, Automatisierung des Lab-Managements, gemeinsame Nutzung und Wiederverwendung von Ressourcen, projektübergreifende Berichterstattung, Unterstützung für heterogene Umgebungen sowie Definition und Verwaltung von Anforderungen. Die Projektplanungs- und -verfolgungsfunktion von ALM/Quality Center ermöglicht es Nutzern, Meilensteine und KPIs zu definieren, zu verfolgen, zu messen und über diese berichten. Nutzer können Berichte extrahieren, Scorecards erstellen und auf mobile Geräte exportieren. ALM/Quality Center ist als cloudbasiertes Abonnement oder als On-Premise-Lizenz erhältlich. Der Support umfasst 24/7-Online-Support, Chat, Dokumentationen, eine Wissensdatenbank, Foren, ein Handbuch und Schulungen.
ALM/Quality Center Software - 1

ALM/Quality Center Preis

ALM/Quality Center bietet keine Gratisversion und keine kostenlose Testversion.

Startpreis:
Nicht vom Anbieter bereitgestellt
Kostenlose Version:
Nein
Kostenlose Testversion:
Nein

Alternativen für ALM/Quality Center

ALM/Quality Center Erfahrungen

Funktionsbewertung

Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
3,9
Funktionalität
4,5
Bedienkomfort
4,4
Kundenbetreuung
3,9
5 von 22 Bewertungen Alle Bewertungen anzeigen
Naveen
Naveen
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 1.001–5.000 Mitarbeiter
  • Wöchentlich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
0
Funktionen
4
Bedienkomfort
4
Kundenbetreuung
0

5
Bewertet am 9.5.2021

Better Application Lifecycle Management tool in the market

Vorteile

It is a fairly easy to use application management tool available in the market which has features to track the status of a defect.

Nachteile

It would be better if we have an ability to create diagrams especially when we are dealing with complex defect created by Tester.

Antwort von OpenText

Thanks for giving ALM/Quality Center a very positive rating and pointing out it is easy to use. Regarding your comment on the ability to create diagrams, we are not sure what you are referring to. Could you share more details and which version you are using? You may check the online help: https://admhelp.microfocus.com/alm to see whether the latest version supports the feature you need, and if applicable submit an enhancement idea at https://community.microfocus.com/adtd/sws-qc/i/alm_qc_idea_exchange.

Ying Lei
Product Marketing Manager, Micro Focus ALM/Quality Center

Beantwortet am 25.5.2021
Per
  • Branche: Pharmazeutika
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionen
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
5

5
Bewertet am 18.2.2022

Quality center is still going strong

Implemented it in 3 major organization, easy to learn is my major experience. An introduction to new users just take 20 min and then they are fully self going.
Worked some other systems where filter seems to be very complicated to implement in an easy way, non filters as good as QC. Compared to JAMA ....

Vorteile

-All features other ALM tool manufacturers claim is actually working better in QC
-Simplicity of using , you know where you are what you filter how you find thing through traces
-More advanced testplanning than all other tool (maybe except codebeamer)
- Easy adminstration
- easy to search and present during audits.
- remarkable possibilities with risk management IF some people just let their confusing ideas start from 0 again

Nachteile

Interface on Explorer
Not entirely web based
Feelgood appearance (Looks old)

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Jama Connect und codebeamer

Warum ALM/Quality Center gewählt wurde

Only requirements and got the "document" thinking.

Gründe für den Wechsel zu ALM/Quality Center

Codebeamer i wanted use but it never happened
Judith
  • Branche: Computer-Software
  • Unternehmensgröße: 201–500 Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 1 Jahr genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
2
Funktionen
3
Bedienkomfort
3
Kundenbetreuung
3

3
Bewertet am 29.6.2022

ALM doesn't have the bang for the buck.

Vorteile

This software is great for tracking requirements and tests. It also tracks issues found, and when they are corrected. However, the reporting is clunky and not easy to work with.

Nachteile

Higher level review to give management insite into the project.

Nitin
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
5
Funktionen
4
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
4

5
Bewertet am 16.2.2020

Test Management tool ALM

I am using ALM from more than 10 years , have seen many enhancements. I love this tool for test Management and highly recommend to other if you can manage the cost.
It’s an easy web based tool for requirements management, test planning, execution and defect reporting.

Vorteile

1. One solution for all Test Management (Test planning, execution and defect management)
2. Fast and reliable
3. Support end to end traceability
4. Integration with UFT automation tool.
5. Support upload using existing Excel test cases
6. Access management for various type of users
7. Web based tool
8. API available for automation

Nachteile

1. Sometime it failed to download components while opening in browser due to access level issue
2. Unfortunately, no support to major automation tool selenium
3. Can’t export attachments with test cases
4. High cost per user
5. If ALM is closed and if you reopen the same test it shows object locked
6. No support to update defect from excel. Except automation API

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Enterprise Architect und Jira

Warum ALM/Quality Center gewählt wurde

Bugzilla had limited options and was not capable for end to end test Management tool.

Zuvor genutzte Software

Bugzilla

Gründe für den Wechsel zu ALM/Quality Center

Perfect for end to end test management tool and quick support, reliable.

Antwort von OpenText

Thanks for the review & high rating. It provided helpful insights. You had cons I'd like to address
#1: If by access level you mean admin permissions, the ALM Client Launcher solved this: https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/alm-client-launcher
#2: The Jenkins plugin enables you to run most types of tests, inc. Selenium & results are reflected in ALM: https://plugins.jenkins.io/hp-application-automation-tools-plugin/
#3: This is known & we'll address soon
#4: Depends on what you want to achieve. Our product has rich ALM functionality built in & high scalability, plus several editions to fit usage needs
#5: Contact customer support with this & provide details
#6: With Connect you can do so without using API. It includes a connector between Excel & ALM that allows you to map fields between the two: https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/micro-focus-connect-core & https://marketplace.microfocus.com/appdelivery/content/micro-focus-connect-connectors

Beantwortet am 27.3.2020
Senthilkumar
  • Branche: Informationstechnologie & -dienste
  • Unternehmensgröße: 10.000+ Mitarbeiter
  • Täglich für Mehr als 2 Jahre genutzt
  • Quelle der Bewertung
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
4
Funktionen
5
Bedienkomfort
5
Kundenbetreuung
4

5
Bewertet am 27.12.2019

Best software life cycle management tool, worth to use

Holding large number of business users who use software systems to track their deliverables which is really challenging one. We designed and create folder structures in ALM modules and customized different workflow models to accommodate the business process, automation and performance testing. Synchronized company users along with ALM LDAP mechanism. Satisfying all business roles like business analysts, developers, Quality assurance and performance teams along with this single tool. Upgrading new version comes with new features and easy to upgrade the data without spending additional cost on application and database servers.

Vorteile

Below are salient features that makes life easy for any software professional -Traceability matrix, end to end traceability, integration with other market tools like JIRA, REST API to develop excel macro utilities, UFT integration, cross project customization, defect management process, Business excel addin to load the entities, risk based planning and execution, Corporate LDAP user management based on single sign on options, business process testing, Auto-pass license server configuration

Nachteile

Apart from high license cost, I see all the features are beneficial. Pointing a one feature that still not comfortable is version management - check out / check in entity.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Jira und qTest

Gründe für den Wechsel zu ALM/Quality Center

It has all software testing life cycle modules - requirement, testing, defect tracking, reporting compared with other market tools like blueprint, JIRA, etc.,

Antwort von OpenText

Hi Senthilkumar,

I reached out to Ying Lei, the product marketing manager for Micro Focus ALM. She wrote, in response: Thank you for taking the time to write a valuable review of our product, where you pointed out its many strengths. Your review indicates that your organization has upgraded to the latest version. I am glad to know that and appreciate your feedback. It not only lets us know how you feel about using the product, but also provides good information for organizations who are evaluating ALM tools. Thank you also for your feedback on the versioning feature. We will include it in future release planning.

Best regards
David Shephard
Program Manager, Customer Engagement at Micro Focus

Beantwortet am 14.1.2020

Ähnliche Kategorien