--- description: Reviews zu Mitti (by SafetyCulture) Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche Mitti (by SafetyCulture) mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: Mitti (by SafetyCulture) | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Schulungsplattformen](/directory/1232/online-training/software) > [Mitti (by SafetyCulture)](/software/113670/iauditor) # Mitti (by SafetyCulture) Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/113670/iauditor Seite: 1 / 16\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/113670/iauditor?page=2) > iAuditor von SafetyCulture ist eine App für Inspektions-Checklisten, mit der Nutzer Checklisten erstellen, Berichte einreichen und Inspektionen über ein Tablet oder Mobiltelefon durchführen können. Die Lösung ist für eine Vielzahl von Branchen konzipiert, die Sicherheitsaudits und Inspektionen erfordern. Mit iAuditor können Nutzer eine Vielzahl von Informationen in verschiedenen Dateitypen erfassen und den Auditverlauf digital speichern, um Trends im Laufe der Zeit zu etablieren und anzuzeigen. Die Software ermöglicht es Nutzern, digitale Sicherheitsprüfungsformulare zu erstellen und interaktive Checklistenvorlagen zu entwickeln. Nutzer können ihre Papierformulare in digitale Formate konvertieren, indem sie sie in iAuditor neu erstellen. Darüber hinaus können Nutzer Inspektionen ohne Internetverbindung durchführen. Nach der Inspektion können Nutzer Berichte in verschiedenen Formaten wie PDF, XML, CSV und DOCX exportieren und per E-Mail versenden. iAuditor ist kompatibel mit iOS-, Android- und Windows-Mobilgeräten und Schnittstellen mit der größeren SafetyCulture-Suite. > > Bewertung: **4.6/5** von 356 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **4.6/5** | 356 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 4.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 4.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 4.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 90% | (9/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: Mitti - **Region**: Surry Hills, Australien - **Gegründet**: 2004 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Startpreis**: 29,00 AU$ - **Preismodell**: (Kostenlose Version verfügbar) (Kostenlose Testversion) - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Chinesisch, Deutsch, Englisch, Französisch, Japanisch, Niederländisch, Portugiesisch, Spanisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Australien, Brasilien, China, Deutschland, Frankreich, Indien, Irland, Japan, Kanada, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Spanien, Vereinigte Staaten, Vereinigtes Königreich ## Funktionen - API - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Aktivitäts-Verfolgung - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Alerts/Escalation - Anlagegegenstand-Management - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Felder - Anpassbare Formulare - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Arbeitsauftragsverwaltung - Arbeitssicherheits-Management - Archivierung & Aufbewahrung - Asset Assignment - Asset Lifecycle Management - Asset Planning - Asset-Kategorisierung - Asynchrones Lernen - Audit Trail - Auditing ## Integrationen (14 insgesamt) - Dropbox - Geotab - Google Drive - Google Sheets - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft Power Automate - Microsoft Power BI - Microsoft SharePoint - Procore - Procore Estimating - Salesforce Sales Cloud - Tableau - Workato - Zapier ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - 24/7 Live-Support - Chat ## Category - [Schulungsplattformen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/1232/online-training/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Schulungsplattformen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/1232/online-training/software) - [Sicherheitsmanagement Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4699/safety-management/software) - [Wartungssoftware](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/395/preventive-maintenance-software/software) - [ESG-Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/4474/esg/software) - [Asset Tracking Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/1560/asset-tracking/software) ## Alternativen 1. [Connecteam](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/109560/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5322 reviews) 2. [Scrut Automation](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/514978/Scrut) — 4.9/5 (139 reviews) 3. [MasterControl Quality Excellence](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/142000/mastercontrol) — 4.5/5 (580 reviews) 4. [Qualio](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/152557/qualio) — 4.6/5 (138 reviews) 5. [Dot Compliance](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/239986/dot-compliance) — 4.4/5 (94 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Powerful Safety Management Tool with Minor Learning Curve" — 5.0/5 > **Dishi** | *25. April 2026* | Buchhaltung | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The biggest advantage of SafetyCulture is its ease of digitizing inspections and audits. Creating checklists is simple, and the ability to customize them based on different operational needs is extremely useful. The mobile app works smoothly, allowing teams to perform inspections on the go. Real-time reporting and analytics provide clear visibility into safety performance, which helps in faster decision-making. Email notifications ensure that important updates and issues are never missed. > > **Nachteile**: While the platform is powerful, there is a slight learning curve for new users, especially when setting up advanced workflows or custom templates. Some features could be more intuitive, and occasional lag in syncing data can disrupt workflow. Pricing can also feel a bit high for smaller teams. > > My overall experience with SafetyCulture has been very positive. It has significantly improved how we manage workplace safety, conduct audits, and track compliance. The platform feels modern and reliable, and it has helped streamline processes that used to be time-consuming and paper-based. ----- ### "Electrical Contracting Review" — 5.0/5 > **Robbie** | *26. April 2026* | Bau | Empfehlungsbewertung: 10.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: SafetyCulture saves time and makes safety management much easier to keep on top of. I like how inspections, audits, actions, and reporting can all be managed in one place instead of relying on paper forms or scattered documents. It helps create a stronger safety culture because issues are easier to record, track, and close out. > > **Nachteile**: Some setup and template customisation can take a little time at the start, especially if you want the system to match existing site processes. Once it is set up properly, it becomes much easier to use. > > My overall experience with SafetyCulture has been very positive. It is easy to use, saves time during inspections and audits, and helps improve visibility of safety issues across the team. The ability to capture information quickly, assign actions, and keep records organised makes it a practical tool for risk and safety management. It supports a more proactive approach to safety rather than just reacting after problems occur. ----- ### "Good software" — 5.0/5 > **Simon** | *14. Februar 2026* | Verbraucherdienste | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: This software does a good job of providing editable forms for collecting health and safety date. We’ve found it useful. > > **Nachteile**: There were some limitations in the way in integrated with our software Jobber. There are work around using Zapier. > > Pretty good software for the health and safety auditing. Once it integrates smoother it will be more useful to us. ----- ### "Great for Digital Transformation, Challenging for Enterprise IT Governance" — 2.0/5 > **Ken** | *31. Juli 2026* | Lebensmittelproduktion | Empfehlungsbewertung: 2.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: SafetyCulture was a good starting point for our organization's move from paper-based processes to digital inspections, audits, training, and operational workflows. We were able to standardize processes across multiple locations and give managers better visibility into activities that were previously difficult to track. The platform allows business teams to create and maintain forms without significant development effort, helping organizations achieve quick wins in their digital transformation journey. For companies looking to replace paper processes with a modern digital solution, SafetyCulture can provide value relatively quickly and with minimal technical resources. The user interface is modern and generally easy to navigate for supervisors, managers, and power users, while collaboration features help teams communicate findings, assign actions, and track completion across departments. > > **Nachteile**: As our deployment expanded, several limitations became more apparent from an enterprise IT perspective. User provisioning and identity management required more effort than expected, particularly when attempting to integrate the platform into existing lifecycle management processes. Documentation and implementation guidance were sometimes difficult to reconcile with real-world scenarios. Employee management and access governance are areas where the platform struggles. Maintaining visibility into user accounts, controlling access consistently, and enforcing organizational standards can become challenging as environments grow. Permissions are not granular enough to support mature governance programs, separation of duties requirements, or least-privilege access models. Workflow and automation capabilities are also limited compared to more mature enterprise platforms. While simple processes work well, more complex approval chains, escalation paths, and multi-stage reviews often require process compromises or manual intervention. Email notifications can become difficult to manage at scale. Some users receive more notifications than necessary, while others struggle to determine which messages require action. Additional controls around notification management and targeting would improve the user experience. As our deployment expanded, several limitations became more apparent from an enterprise IT perspective. User provisioning and identity management required more effort than expected, particularly when attempting to integrate the platform into existing lifecycle management processes. Documentation and implementation guidance were sometimes difficult to reconcile with real-world scenarios. Employee management and access governance are areas where the platform struggles. Maintaining visibility into user accounts, controlling access consistently, and enforcing organizational standards can become challenging as environments grow. Permissions are not granular enough to support mature governance programs, separation of duties requirements, or least-privilege access models. Workflow and automation capabilities are also limited compared to more mature enterprise platforms. While simple processes work well, more complex approval chains, escalation paths, and multi-stage reviews often require process compromises or manual intervention. Email notifications can become difficult to manage at scale. Some users receive more notifications than necessary, while others struggle to determine which messages require action. Additional controls around notification management and targeting would improve the user experience. Customer support is responsive and professional, but advanced questions involving identity management, integrations, and administrative controls often required significant independent research and testing. We frequently relied on our own investigation to understand limitations and develop workable solutions. > > Our overall experience has been positive from an operational perspective but more challenging from an enterprise IT perspective. SafetyCulture helped us move away from paper-based processes and provided operational teams with tools they could adopt quickly. The platform is effective at helping organizations begin their digital transformation journey, especially for inspections, audits, observations, training, and process documentation. As adoption increased, however, we encountered challenges around governance, identity management, employee administration, and long-term scalability. While the user interface is visually appealing, we observed frontline employees struggling to locate assigned training, understand account ownership, and consistently navigate certain day-to-day tasks. These issues became more noticeable in environments with shared devices and large numbers of operational users. Team collaboration features work well for managing actions and sharing information across departments, but the platform often feels optimized for departmental adoption rather than enterprise-wide governance. Frequent feature releases demonstrate active product development, but they can also create additional oversight and change-management requirements for IT teams. I would recommend SafetyCulture to organizations beginning their digital transformation efforts or replacing paper processes. However, organizations with mature enterprise requirements around governance, identity management, security, compliance, employee lifecycle management, and Zero Trust architectures should carefully evaluate whether the platform's administrative capabilities can scale alongside their long-term needs. ----- ### "Safety Culture Positive Experience" — 5.0/5 > **Molly** | *26. April 2026* | Bau | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: It has a very intuitive user face, it's easy to navigate, the functionality is logical and easy to understand. The inspection tool especially has set the standard for us, it's logic and capabilities are awesome. > > **Nachteile**: The back end set up can be a little bit messy, and there are some shortfalls in the assignment functions. There's no way to see someone's progress through a module, no notifications for when an assignment has been submitted, and no indicator when an assignment has been submitted but not yet marked. > > Positive\! It's a very dynamic tool that offers a lot of customisability in a way that's logical and easy to follow. It's been easy to roll out and it offers a lot of potential for it's scope of use. ----- Seite: 1 / 16\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/113670/iauditor?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/113670/iauditor) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | fr | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten