aqua

Vorteile

Die Funktionen "Verwaltung der Anforderungen", "Verwaltung der Testfälle", "Verwaltung der Testszenarien" und "Verwaltung der Bugs" bauen logisch aufeinander auf und sind mit kurzer Einweisung gut zu benutzen.

Die automatische Erstellung von Testfallvarianten aufgrund von Wertetabellen finde ich grandios.

Das Durchführen der Testszenarios lässt bisher keine Wünsche offen.

Nachteile

Die Benuzterführung in der Weboberfläche ist nicht ganz einheitlich gestaltet und manchmal etwas umständlich, z.B. bei der Sortierung von Testfällen in den Testszenarien. Ich hoffe, dass in zukünftigen Versionen daran noch gefeilt wird.

Vorteile

Getting started with Aqua Cloud was quite easy thanks to its good web interface. I was able to set up projects and create test cases quickly. Really loved an AI test case generation feature. It generated test cases by analyzing requirements.

Nachteile

It couldn't integrate with some of the tools I'd need.

Vorteile

This tool offers an own system structure, also you have a perfect individual overview. You can integrate a lot of tools with the free api.

Nachteile

The Performance can be fastersome little things can be better but these aren't test relevant things

Vorteile

Easy to use, big set of functions, good reports

Nachteile

Everything is fine, I can do everything I need with it

Vorteile

Aqua is very easy to learn. It enables the management of manual and automated tests. The user and roles management as well as project configuration ensure an exact information management at projects. Additionally Andagon offers a great product support.

Nachteile

The documentation of SSO wasn't up to date, which caused us some issues. But Andagon helped out within a conference call.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Gründe für den Wechsel zu aqua

Vorteile

Intuitive operating without excessive training if you know such tools like HP-ALM. If training is needed e.g. for testers there are enough documents available for that.

Nachteile

Building test scenarios (=test sets) for a dedicated release is a bit tricky. You have to enter the target release in the requirements, set a filter to that target release and then display the related test cases and build a test scenario out of that.

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Warum aqua gewählt wurde

Gründe für den Wechsel zu aqua

Vorteile

It is really intuitive, has a great look and shows the results very visual. It is as well very easy to personalize with own fields and selections. And the support is very quick and helpful!

Nachteile

There is nothing bad I can say about this product, except that I still need to do the testing myself :-D

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Gründe für den Wechsel zu aqua

Vorteile

It really has everything an ALM tool should have and it's still getting better with every update. Price is reasonable and their support team is fast and reliable.

Nachteile

The desktop client has still a few more features than the web client

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Vorteile

Clear structure and handling for a test documentation.

Nachteile

I find the manual very complex. There are probably many other functions you could use Aqua for - but filtering them out takes a lot of time.

Vorteile

aqua can be operated intuitively, administration is easily understandable. The reporting is conclusive and provides a good basis for decision making. After having used aqua, employees value the speed.

Automating manual test cases is easier. A seamless integration environment with a set of test tools helps to do it.

The tests can be run efficiently with different test data, thanks to possible sets of variables.

Nachteile

In my experience I have not had dissatisfaction with the application. the implementation of modules, generate report, was practical and simple.

Vorteile

-Friendly interface and easy to use.
-A complete tool for testing. You can do pretty much any testing-related tasks.
-Automatic testing.
-Great customer service.
-Fair prices.

Nachteile

-At the beginning, maybe not 100% intuitive.
-Limited trial version. It would be nice to have the experience of a user management system even during the trial period.

Vorteile

I think we got a fair price for a solid mix of issue tracking, reporting, and even some agile functionality. Customer support is always answering very quickly and the product is often updated. Recently they added AI features in test case creation and it already saves us a lot of time.

Nachteile

I don’t know, I have nothing in mind

Vorteile

aqua is the best tool I've ever used for requirements and test case management. It's very easy to use, and has a convenient Google Chrome app that allows us to track bugs easily and create reports Automatically. The new beta AI features also save our time by allowing us to create test cases from requirements automatically and requiring only minor editing by our testers.

Nachteile

It would be nice if there were more videos during onboarding

Vorteile

It's a great tool that integrates seamlessly with Jira and simplifies communication between developers and testers in our team

Nachteile

Nothing special. We implemented it pretty quick in our company

Vorteile

Aqua gives us a great overview over all our testing activity, including test cases and test scenarios.

Nachteile

Views would sometimes get stuck and show no tickets, but that doesn't happen anymore.

Vorteile

aqua helps to gather all the data from automated and manual testing in one place. The integrations work really good, it saves us a lot of time

Nachteile

There is no test automation inside the tool, so we have to use test automation tools as integrations

Vorteile

I learned aqua intuitively, it was as if I had always known aqua!

It is very easy to create complex data constellations for the test cases, for example in Excel and import them into aqua.
When carrying out the test, you have the right conditions, the right data for every test step and the expected results for every test scenario!

Reports and dashboards are easy to configure and you always get the data in real time, very useful to act quickly.

Nachteile

If you don't find something, refresh the view or delete the filters ;-)

Vorteile

The product is very easy to use, it comes with an office like UI and we were able to get started within hours. Aqua offers a number of options to optimize or filter certain aspects and hide a lot of complexity. Thus being easy to use for multiple people.

We liked the reporting functionality and the comment functions to help improve our requirements and test process.

Nachteile

We ran into some minor issues which were mostly solved by the support team. We still have some issues with exporting to excel, since rtf export were not human readable.

Vorteile

We use aqua primarily for requirements engineering and it works very good for us. Before we started with aqua we used text files for describing the requirements of our products. Especially the change-tracking was very complicated. With aqua it is now very easy to collect requirements from different sources and managed them.

Nachteile

The installation of new aqua-releases could be simplified and some pre-definied reports would be helpful.

Vorteile

Very comprehensive tool that covers Test Management from A-Z. Sales/Customer Support was amazing. The option to add free users to work on Defect Management only is perfect for smaller teams and companies that work with externals. At the same time, the more expensive options give clients that can afford it all the extras they could need.

Nachteile

The layout/look is a little traditional (which some companies actually may prefer) and the lack of an agile/scrum board for Defect Management for free Users was an issue for us (but it's a free version so can't really complain)

Vorteile

Modern, sleek look and easy to use and great interface to use with other tools

Nachteile

More interfaces for different tools would be great

Vorteile

- modern and clean surface

- supports all phases of the fundamental test process
-> helpful functions for the test planning
-> promotes the control of the tests (transparent inspection trough the active test analysis and execution
-> structured test design
-> easy documentation of the test execution
-> detailed reporting

- individual and adaptable reports

- helpful wiki

Nachteile

- the abundance of functions is not only a blessing, it's also a curse
-> at the beginning it's not easy to understand all the different Buttons, functions, tabs and so on

Vorteile

- Desktop application / Web application
- Functionality
- Pricing
- License management

Nachteile

More possibilities in the Jira Sync plugin

Vorteile

The Product is easy to use. The Product is extensive

Nachteile

I Dont missing features. Integration Confluence. Testautomation is not so easy to implemated

Vorteile

Easy to use, intuitive approach from testcase to bugs an solutions

Nachteile

Difference between Desktop and WebClient in administrator mode

Vorteile

usability & functionality & GUI & setting-up multiple users

Nachteile

UML for relation settings & some minor bugs

In Betracht gezogene Alternativen

Vorteile

It is a complete ALM-tool with all functions which you need for testmanagement.

Nachteile

The usability of some functions is a bit tricky. But I didn´t know a tool which is easier to handle.

Vorteile

The ease of use for setting up test cases, tracking defects, and robust reporting.

Nachteile

Lack of out-of-box reporting available with the lower tier pricing options