--- description: Reviews zu AdvancedMD EHR Software: Systemübersicht, Funktionen, Preisinformationen und Ratings & Reviews. Entdecke kostenlose Live-Demos und vergleiche AdvancedMD EHR mit ähnlichen Programmen. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/software_advice/og_logo-55146305bbe7b450bea05c18e9be9c9a.png title: AdvancedMD EHR | Bewertungen, Preise und Demos – SoftwareAdvice DE --- Breadcrumb: [Startseite](/) > [Radiologie Software](/directory/175/radiology-information-systems/software) > [AdvancedMD EHR](/software/1018/advancedmd-advancedemr) # AdvancedMD EHR Canonical: https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1018/advancedmd-advancedemr Seite: 1 / 20\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1018/advancedmd-advancedemr?page=2) > AdvancedMD ist eine einheitliche Suite mit Softwarelösungen für Organisationen in den Bereichen psychische Gesundheit, Physiotherapie und Gesundheitswesen sowie für unabhängige Arztpraxen. Zu den Funktionen gehören Praxismanagement, elektronische Patientenakten, medizinische Abrechnung, Tools für die Patientenbindung, Telemedizinfunktionen, Patientenakten, Reputationsmanagement, Finanzanalysen und Business-Intelligence-Berichterstattung, die alle zusammenarbeiten, um Arbeitsabläufe in medizinischen Praxen zu automatisieren. Integrierte Arbeitsabläufe automatisieren den Patientenzyklus und verbessern die Patientenerfahrung, beginnend mit einer Selbstbedienungsfunktion für die Vereinbarung von Terminen vor Ort oder per Telemedizin. Erinnerungen können per SMS oder E-Mail gesendet werden, um Patienten über Termine zu benachrichtigen. Mithilfe automatisierter Funktionen wird die Verifizierung der Versicherungsberechtigung von Patienten mit Terminen am nächsten Tag automatisch durchgeführt und das Personal auf potenzielle Probleme aufmerksam gemacht. Aufnahme- und Einwilligungsformulare werden über ein Patientenportal gesendet und automatisch in die Patientenakte aufgenommen. Mit einem Arztdashboard können Akten und Rezepte von einem zentralen Ort aus verwaltet werden. Die Gebührenerfassung erfolgt während des Aktenführungsprozesses, ohne dass das Abrechnungspersonal Inhalte kopieren und einfügen muss. Die Cloud-Plattform von AdvancedMD bietet Fernzugriff und ein Höchstmaß an Datensicherheit. AdvancedMD ist browserunabhängig für Mac- und Windows-Betriebssysteme und über eine iOS- und Android-App für Mobilgeräte verfügbar. > > Bewertung: **3.6/5** von 466 Nutzern. Top bewertet für **Weiterempfehlungsquote**. ----- ## Kurzstatistiken und Ratings | Metrik | Bewertung | Detail | | **Gesamt** | **3.6/5** | 466 Nutzerbewertungen | | Bedienkomfort | 3.5/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Kundenbetreuung | 3.4/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis | 3.3/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Funktionen | 3.6/5 | Auf Basis der Gesamtbewertungen | | Empfehlungsprozentsatz | 60% | (6/10 Weiterempfehlungsquote) | ## Über den Anbieter - **Unternehmen**: AdvancedMD - **Region**: South Jordan, USA - **Gegründet**: 1993 ## Gewerblicher Kontext - **Zielgruppe**: Selbstständig, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1.000, 1.001–5.000, 5.001–10.000, 10.000+ - **Bereitstellungen und Plattformen**: Cloud, SaaS, webbasiert, Mac (Desktop), Windows (Desktop), Android (mobil), iPhone (mobil), iPad (mobil) - **Unterstützte Sprachen**: Englisch - **Verfügbare Länder**: Vereinigte Staaten ## Funktionen - API - Abrechnung & Rechnungsstellung - Aktivitäts-Dashboard - Alarmfunktion / Benachrichtigungen - Analytics - Anfangsbeurteilung - Anmerkungen - Anpassbare Berichte - Anpassbare Formulare - Anpassbare Teste - Anpassbare Vorlagen - Audit Trail - Aufgabenbibliothek - Aufgabenmanagement - Aufgabenplanung - Aufnahmemanagement - Auftragserfassung - Automatisierte Terminplanung - Behandlungsplanung - Berichterstattung / Analyse ## Optionen für Kundensupport - E-Mail/Helpdesk - FAQ/Forum - Wissensdatenbank - Telefon-Support - Chat ## Category - [Radiologie Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/175/radiology-information-systems/software) ## Ähnliche Kategorien - [Radiologie Software](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/175/radiology-information-systems/software) - [Elektronische Patientenakten für Urologen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/13/urology-electronic-medical-records-software/software) - [Elektronische Patientenakten für Neurologie](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/101/neurology-software/software) - [Webbasierte medizinische Abrechnungssoftware](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/15/web-based-medical-billing-software/software) - [Elektronische Patientenakten für Ophthalmologie](https://www.softwareadvice.de/directory/103/ophthalmology-software/software) ## Alternativen 1. [athenaOne](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1106/athenacollector-athenaclinicals) — 3.8/5 (912 reviews) 2. [Jane](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/86099/jane) — 4.8/5 (534 reviews) 3. [Epic](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/3954/epiccare) — 4.4/5 (455 reviews) 4. [Elation](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/3790/elation-emr) — 3.8/5 (83 reviews) ## Nutzerbewertungen ### "Four years in, the software was never the constraint" — 4.0/5 > **Brian** | *4. August 2026* | Krankenhausversorgung & Gesundheitswesen | Empfehlungsbewertung: 9.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: Real-time access to your own data, which is the whole ballgame at scale. Automation goes well past what ships in the box, so adding providers doesn't mean adding headcount. Scheduling holds up across locations and providers at volume, and the notes and forms are customizable enough that we built them around our workflow instead of the other way around. Single sign-on and SCIM provisioning are available, so staff log in with the same Microsoft or Google account they use for everything else and accounts get created and shut off automatically as people join and leave. That is a real security and administrative win once you're past a handful of users, and it's rarely on anyone's evaluation list. Handles complex payer mixes without complaint. We worked our EDI agreements payer by payer and eliminated 98% of paper billing. Four years, heavy growth, and it kept up. > > **Nachteile**: Steep at first, and it prices above the small-practice systems, which is the complaint you'll see most. Nobody making that argument has run the return. Software is a rounding error against payroll, and if the system absorbs manual work and shortens the time from visit to deposit, the difference disappears inside the first quarter. Support is the part with the most room to improve; complex issues can take a few passes to land with someone who knows the depths of the system. Nobody's perfect there and I've seen worse. The bigger issue isn't the vendor's: most practices configure this once at go-live and never again, then blame the software for what the default settings do. This system rewards investment in setup more than any other I've used. Knowing how to point it at practice cash flow and then scale it to enterprise throughput and volume is the part almost nobody is looking at, and it's the part that decides what you get out of it. If you plan to stay exactly the size you are and never change how you run, you'll never touch most of what you're paying for. > > Four years on AdvancedMD, currently running about 70,000 appointments a month across a nationwide behavioral health group of roughly 200 people. My role there is Chief Digital Officer, so I own the technology and the operations and the P\&L consequences of both. I've worked inside a number of other practices on this system over the years, some larger than ours, so this isn't a one-instance opinion. Most reviews are written in the first ninety days, when implementation is fresh, everything is hard, and you don't really know yet what you're looking at. Four years in, the picture is different. What determined our results was not the software choice; it was what got built on top of it. Same login, same screens, and our average cash conversion went from 76 days to under 10 across more than 200 payers, with clean claims above 95%. Every system hits a wall where the report you need doesn't exist and automation stops at whatever the vendor built. That wall isn't here. Two findings from practices I've worked with: $188,000 in visits sitting unsigned, every one an invoice that could not be billed, and $40,000 in late cancellation and no-show fees the practice was owed and never charged. That $40,000 is pure cash; no claim, no payer, no waiting, and with a card on file it collects immediately. Neither showed up in a standard report. Both were sitting in the system the whole time. If you're evaluating right now: demos are built around screens, because screens fit in an hour. The part of this system that matters most isn't a screen, so it never comes up. You can sit through four demos and leave with an accurate read on the interface and no idea what the system can actually do. ----- ### "Efficient EHR for 2025" — 4.0/5 > **Heather** | *11. April 2026* | Psychische Gesundheitsfürsorge | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: I appreciated that this EHR was a lot more efficient and customizable than the last EHR we were using. It made scheduling patient’s fairly easy and the patient portal was nice so that communication between patients and practitioners was integrated into the system. Customer support was very fast and efficient which was nice because when issued this system it was new for the whole company. The use of AI integrated into the system was helpful also. It was also very easy to learn and customize to our needs. Patient Management was also a lot smoother with this system then the last system we had used. It was nice to have zoom integrated into the system for virtual visits. > > **Nachteile**: We did a lot of group scheduling which sometimes did not go smoothly which would then make it hard for us to bill those sessions. However there was always a work around to make it work for us we just sometimes had to be a little more creative. > > I had an a great experience with AdvancedMD when I was with the company that used it. It was a great improvement from the last EHR we had used. AdvancedMD worked a lot smoother then our past EHR and there was less bugs which helped with productivity. ----- ### "Useful tips" — 4.0/5 > **Ali** | *28. November 2018* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 8.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: ease of system in general for the most part and the f1 key is very helpful lots of usefull filters helpful lots of usefull filters > > **Nachteile**: unable to create own rules and bridges for bariatric Would love to append a dx to a certain cpt code- would love to create a no show fee when patient is no showed > > Would love to append a dx to a certain cpt code- would love to create a no show fee when patient is no showed ----- ### "AMD, the EMR you love to hate" — 4.0/5 > **Scott** | *23. Februar 2025* | Medizinische Praxis | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The EHR and PM (billing module) are well designed, efficient, and they work. The portal is very functional: patients can make appointments, make payments, see what medications were sent and the pharmacy to which they were sent, make out forms and submit them. Overall, the EHR and PM are powerful, if expensive, but you get what you pay for. > > **Nachteile**: The eRx function is very inefficient. For example, to resend 4 medications, you have to select each one, hit "Resend" which then requires you to send each one individually, or save each one to the main console, select each one again, and then send. To resend 3 CII medications, you have to rebuild one Rx, which then can be duplicated, save to console, then reselect, and then send. AMD uses DrFirst EPCS which requires you to select each scheduled med individually, and then in the EPCS you have to select each one again, individually, enter a password, and then enter a rolled 6 digit code from Symantec VIP (rather than tapping ID.me's column that pops up on your phone. The most recent update actually removed a "Quick Resend" feature so that now, as described above, you have to click each Rx to resend at least twice instead of once and send. The AMD team has made it clear they are not going to restore this feature in response to the heated negative feedback in the "Suggestions"/feedback box. Be sure to have your salesperson walk you through the eRx function before committing to AMD to be sure you know the inefficiency and lack of user response you are getting into. > > I love the ability to send out my custom ratings to each patient prior to the appointment, refer to them in the appointment, and have them built into the final note. The telehealth powered by Zoom is very functional. My experienced biller swears by the PM module. By contrast, the eRx is painfully inefficient, and the eRx team shows little interesting is making it efficient. Love/Hate. ----- ### "Advanced EHR" — 4.0/5 > **Amanda** | *3. April 2026* | Psychische Gesundheitsfürsorge | Empfehlungsbewertung: 7.0/10 > > **Vorteile**: The responsiveness of the customer service team for troubleshooting problems. Scheduling was easy to manage. > > **Nachteile**: The inability to unsubscribe from marketing emails once I made an account. Too much spam was sent to my inbox. > > I've been pleased with the customer support team and appreciative of their efforts to make sure I have the best experience possible. ----- Seite: 1 / 20\ Weiter: [Nächste Seite](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1018/advancedmd-advancedemr?page=2) ## Links - [Auf SoftwareAdvice anzeigen](https://www.softwareadvice.de/software/1018/advancedmd-advancedemr) ## Diese Seite ist in den folgenden Sprachen verfügbar | Sprache | URL | | de | | | en | | | en-AU | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | ----- ## Strukturierte Daten